Pfizer COVID Jab Has 'No Significant Effect' Against Infection or Transmission: Journal 'BMC Medicine'
"COVID-19 vaccines may not represent an effective tool in protecting individuals from either transmitting or acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection," the study authors confirm.
A Wednesday publication in the peer-reviewed medical journal BMC Medicine confirms mRNA COVID-19 injections have “no significant effect” against infection or transmission.
Follow Jon Fleetwood: Instagram @realjonfleetwood / Twitter @JonMFleetwood / Facebook @realjonfleetwood
Between July 2021 and September 2022, the study tracked the effect of Pfizer Inc.’s BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 shot in Monaco for different variants of concern (VOC).
Researchers investigated 20,443 contacts from 6,320 index cases using data from the Monaco COVID-19 Public Health Programme.
They calculated secondary attack rates (SARs), which measure how easily an infection spreads among close contacts, in 13,877 households, 2,508 schools, and 6,499 workplaces.
The study found that vaccination had “no significant effect” in protecting against COVID infection or transmission.
In households, the infection rate was 55% for unvaccinated people and 50% for vaccinated people.
In workplaces, the infection rate was 32% for unvaccinated people and 12% for vaccinated people.
In schools, it was 7% for unvaccinated people and 6% for vaccinated people.
Overall, vaccine effectiveness was 32% for Delta and 27% for Omicron BA.1 & BA.2 in contacts, and 7% for Delta and 11% for Omicron BA.1 & BA.2 in index cases.
The study also showed that less vaccinations were associated with greater effectiveness against infection.
The highest effectiveness (45%) was seen in those with a previous infection and one vaccine dose during Omicron BA.1 & BA.2.
The lowest effectiveness was seen in those with three doses (-24%) or one dose and a previous infection (-36%) during Omicron BA.4 & BA.5.
Follow Jon Fleetwood: Instagram @realjonfleetwood / Twitter @JonMFleetwood / Facebook @realjonfleetwood
However, the authors confirm Pfizer’s jab offered individuals “low” protection regardless of number of doses.
“Protection conferred by the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against transmission and infection was low for delta and omicron BA.1&2, regardless of the number of vaccine doses and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection,” they write. “There was no significant vaccine effect for omicron BA.4&5.”
The researchers warn health leaders that the jab “may not represent an effective tool” against COVID.
“Health authorities carrying out vaccination campaigns should bear in mind that the current generation of COVID-19 vaccines may not represent an effective tool in protecting individuals from either transmitting or acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection,” they state.
In their conclusion, the authors reemphasized the COVID shot’s ineffectiveness in protecting against infection and transmission, citing its diminishing effectiveness with each new variant.
“Our findings provide real-life evidence that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine provides low protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and limited protection against transmission in households since the emergence of the delta variant,” they write. “This effect has decreased with more recent variants.”
According to the doctors, vaccination campaigns should avoid advertising the shots as protective against infection or transmission:
“Future vaccination campaigns should emphasise the important role of COVID-19 vaccines in reducing severe disease and death among vulnerable population groups, rather than as a means to protect individuals from either transmitting or acquiring infection.”
The authors’ affiliations include:
Directorate of Health Affairs, Monaco, Monaco
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool
United Kingdom Health Security Agency
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe
Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester.
Directorate of Health Affairs, Monaco
You can download the full study below:
Follow Jon Fleetwood: Instagram @realjonfleetwood / Twitter @JonMFleetwood / Facebook @realjonfleetwood
'More Than 3 Million Excess Deaths Since 2020': Mainstream Media Finally Admit COVID Jabs 'May Have Helped Fuel Rise' in Excess Mortality
British newspaper The Daily Telegraph on Tuesday reported findings published in The British Medical Journal (BMJ) supporting the claim that COVID-19 jabs “could be partly to blame for the rise in excess deaths since the pandemic, scientists have suggested.”
Natural Infection Provides More Diverse Antibody Protection Than COVID-19 Injections: Harvard, Boston Children's, Massachusetts General, Brigham and Women's Hospitals
A study published online last month ahead of print in BioRxiv confirms natural SARS-CoV-2 infection supplies the body with more antibodies than COVID-19 mRNA jabs in children under 5 years of age.
Natural Infection Provides Superior Immune Protection Compared to COVID Jab: Journal 'Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology'
A study published last month in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology confirms that natural SARS-CoV-2 infection confers a more potent mucosal immunity following infection compared to vaccination with the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 jab in children.
COVID Spike Protein—Present in Pfizer, Moderna mRNA Jabs—Helps Cancer Cells Survive Chemotherapy: Brown University Study Preprint in 'BioRxiv'
Brown University researchers posted a preprint study last month in BioRxiv, an open-access preprint repository for the biological sciences, confirming that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interferes with the effectiveness of chemotherapy treatment for cancer.
Pfizer COVID Jab's Dangerous DNA Impurities 'Exceed the Permitted Limit Value' by 'More Than 500 Times': Peer-Reviewed Journal 'Methods and Protocols'
A new study published this month in MDPI’s peer-reviewed Methods and Protocols confirms Pfizer Inc.’s COVID-19 injection contains in some cases “more than 500 times” the permitted limit of potentially cancer-causing DNA contamination.
COVID Jab Spike Protein Remains in Body 'Up to 245 Days'—Not a 'Few Weeks' as Health Authorities Claimed: Journal 'MedRxiv'
A March publication in the peer-reviewed medical journal MedRxiv confirms that the spike protein produced by cells after mRNA COVID-19 injection remains in the body for “up to 245 days,” contradicting claims from mainstream health authorities.
COVID-Vaccinated Who Receive 4 Doses 'More Likely to Become Infected Than People Who Received Fewer Vaccinations': European Journal of Clinical Investigation
A November study published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation found that SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was higher in those who received four vaccinations compared to less vaccinated individuals. Among 3,986,312 previously infected individuals in Australia, 281,291 (7.1%) had four and 1,545,242 (38.8%) had three vaccinations at baseline, accord…
4th Vaccine Booster Less than 2% Effective Against COVID After Just 4 Months, While 'Recent Previous Infection Provided More Sustained Protection': 9,560-Patient Study in 'The Lancet'
A recent publication in the peer-reviewed medical journal The Lancet analyzed the protection of a fourth dose of mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. The study authors compared the effectiveness of the fourth booster dose to prior infection among 9,560 U.K. healthcare workers.
The only thing that Big Pharma wants to "protect", is their bank account! Even if those bioweapon shots did provide "protection"... against what? The only people getting sick, are the ones foolish enough to be injected.
I saw the following article and I assumed that it was funded by bill boy - just like over 35,000 other entities.
https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2024-05-28/scientists-developing-mrna-based-vaccine-against-h5n1-bird-flu
I know what I know, because I do exhaustive research; I follow the money and connect the dots!
It took me about 10 seconds to find the connection!
This eugenics creep invests five million - to make BILLIONS from the nanobot shot!
https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2020/07/inv016988