21 Comments
User's avatar
Krissy's avatar

Of course they did!! Its all one big satanic s show

They want full control

Everyone get it? How about you in back of the room?

Your dayz of so called freedom are long over! Trump is assisting the anti~Christ new world order

They are all actors

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

The proof that Trump is one of them is his continued failure to ban the dangerous and defective mRNA shots even after they have killed millions and saved no one.

Expand full comment
JoshuaRayJongema.Com's avatar

The only proof I needed was the fact he has attended the Al Smith Memorial Dinner with his father, every year, since he was a child. The man was groomed for a position of power.

Check this video for a good overview on that: https://youtu.be/mpR96zVrmNY?feature=shared

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

WTF? This is blatantly unconstitutional:

Tenth Amendment:

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Expand full comment
Clyde's avatar

Thank you Patrick, I usually include the 9th amendment as well, about denying and disparaging unenumerated rights, but as life would have it, those who actually take the time to read the Constitution with understanding, do not work for or within government actor's/actresses guilds. They have thrown out the 4th amendment and run with "Probable Cause" every day because whatever they want to dream up always comes back to those gang banger "might makes right". affiliations.

Expand full comment
patrick.net/memes's avatar

Thanks, good point about the 9th:

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

Expand full comment
Mad Hedgehog's avatar

Do not fall for the “free offer” to have your DNA tested for genetic predisposition for diseases. My GP works for a university system. They keep contacting me with ‘Would you like to find out your genetic predisposition? Your community needs your DNA.” Biden endorsed a project where NIH would collect genetic data to for all Americans “to fight cancers”. There is a strong push to collect newborns’ DNA under the excuse of early diagnostics of PKU and other metabolic diseases. While testing for those is needed, hospitals should not genotype for anything else and must destroy blood samples after testing. They do not.

Expand full comment
Jill Herendeen's avatar

Well, why the heck not? They already enacted a bill to prevent localities from protecting themselves from cell phone towers. (Just ANOTHER reason we need universal healthcare which THE RICH must fund for everyone, only w/out being allowed to profit from their ownership thereof.)

Expand full comment
Shelie's avatar

Not surprised. The CONstitution was trashed long ago. "They" have been "testing" on the public, killing people, poisoning people and the environment, behavior modification, propaganda, and lying since forever. Not to mention the drug, human, and weapons trafficking and money laundry. We all knew this was coming. At least some of us knew. Mind and body control, and post humanism has been the goal of the hidden hand for a long long time. That psycho guru of the WEF Yuval Noah Harari stood on stage and told all his cohorts "freewill, that's over" among other demonic statements. All the young techies and transhumanists are loving it. They built it, along with a bunch of DARPA funded (US tax payers) psycho scientists and engineers.

Expand full comment
Roberto Lopez's avatar

El Servicio Meteorológico Nacional no puede identificar las fuentes de datos de temperatura "de 103 estaciones meteorológicas inexistentes o inactivas, lo que socava la fiabilidad de sus registros climáticos. Investigaciones independientes revelaron casos como el de Scole (operativo entre 1971 y 1980), que reportó datos entre 1959 y 2020. Los críticos argumentan que el Servicio Meteorológico Nacional...

Por NewsTarget.com // Lea la historia completa

Expand full comment
Roberto Lopez's avatar

103 Stations with no trace, no evidence

In May 2025, citizen investigator Ray Sanders revealed that the Met Office cannot name specific weather stations providing temperature data for 103 so-called “zombie sites”—locations that ceased operation decades ago or never existed. After submitting FOI requests, Sanders discovered the agency admitted it lacks records detailing the “well-correlated neighboring stations” supposedly used to estimate data for these non-functional sites.

Sanders highlighted two cases: Scole, a Norfolk station operational only from 1971-1980, which now lists temperature averages spanning 1959-2020—including a full decade before its establishment. The Met Office defended this by citing “regression analysis” to maintain long-term climate averages but refused to name the stations that supplied data for Scole’s 1990–2020 records, stating such information is “not held.” A similar issue arose with Manby, a Lincolnshire site closed in 1974, yet still listed with 60 years of temperature data.

“If the data isn’t real and relies on unverified estimates from unknown sources, it’s no better than fiction,” Sanders said. “Any scientist would tell you this breaches fundamental standards. Without verifiable sources, Credibility vanishes.”

A pattern of data controversies in climate science

The Met Office’s transparency struggles echo decades of disputes in climatology. In 2009, emails from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit exposed efforts to manipulate temperature data and suppress skeptical research. A decade later, NOAA faced accusations of fabricating data for 30% of U.S. reporting stations, as documented by meteorologist Anthony Watts.

“Ghost data has a track record,” Watts noted. “It’s the equivalent of admitting in court that you have no evidence—and yet we’re supposed to trust it for trillion-dollar policies?”

The Met Office’s current practices draw particular criticism for overlapping with Net Zero advocacy. Chief Scientist Stephen Belcher has linked rising global temperatures to extreme weather events, citing a doubling of hot days since 2014. However, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has found no such trend, raising questions about the quality of U.K. data feeding global models.

Expand full comment
NE Garden Guru's avatar

They're still doing this today

Just watch the Weather Channel BS and daily AQI

Plume and other sites fabricate stats as well

Expand full comment
Roberto Lopez's avatar

Thank you

@NE Garden Guru

Expand full comment
Roberto Lopez's avatar

@NE Garden Guru

Expand full comment
Roberto Lopez's avatar

Thank you

NE Garden Guru

Expand full comment
Roberto Lopez's avatar

The U.S. Department of Defense awarded a contract for COVID-19 research to a company in Ukraine three months before its existence was known.

Expand full comment
http://coronistan.blogspot.com's avatar

Who controls AI? ISrahell!

Who want's to kill all non-[redacted]? [Redacted]!

Expand full comment
Depswah's avatar

WTF: Give us a day to go to the moon Alice! People, WTFU! This ain't your life, it's beginning to look more n mo like theirs and you ain't in it!!!

Expand full comment
AWAKENING's avatar

Thank you for sharing

Expand full comment
Chad's avatar

Well that makes him two face. States can have abortion rights but not AI rights.

It's like Israel can commit genocide but South Africa can not.

Expand full comment
NE Garden Guru's avatar

No surprise

Expand full comment