I don't mean to be a buzz kill, but it's been almost 5 years. Even if we manage to get them withdrawn, we cant treat it as a victory. Let's get the legal immunity withdrawn from vaccines, then we wouldn't have to fight them to withdraw anything unsafe, they would withdraw it themselves.
Funny, Dr. Boyle is an American citizen and college Professor but no buy-in from the US?? Makes one wonder. I know there are legislators, Doctors and Researchers in the US that would gladly sign on to this letter.
The executive staff employed by 'vaccine' manufacturers should be arrested and indicted for multiple acts of Murder in the First Degree. Forensic data implicate these products as intentional bio-weapons, and executive staff knew the consequences before hand.
That said: Here's an alternative designed to deflect medical 'experts' from pushing victims into the vaccine trap. You must read and understand the document. The *intention* of the Notice is to place *direct liability* on the provider of the vaccine product.
Quoted from the form: - CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF VACCINATION - - AGREEMENT BETWEEN VACCINE PROVIDERS AND VACCINATED PARTY -
Opening Statement: “Herein the terms “administration” and “administrators” refers to all parties providing and/or “mandating” vaccine services and products including vaccine Manufacturers, Marketers, Lobbyists, Distributors, Hospitals, Clinics, Physicians, Nurses, Government Agents and Agencies, Healthcare Providers, Elected Officials, Enforcement Persons, Agencies and Programs, and all other parties bringing “mandated” vaccines to application or to market in any way.” [End quote]
An exquisitely detailed description of the mental cytokine storm unleashed upon our critical faculties and our ability to prioritize our response and resistance to the Fourth Industrial Revolution and its hundreds of global public-private partnerships and NGO’s and Young Global Graduates all backed by our tax and consumption dollars to the tune of $10 trillion dollars. And all the while, Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Larry Fink, John Kerry et al, continue to manufacture crises in order to manufacture our consent to their hostile, global, totalitarian technocracy.
What system have they spared? Our coin operated Congress, our election integrity based upon two electronic machine counting companies with checkered ownership, destroying our food supply with H5N1 injections, killing healthy farm animals, restricting the supply of nitrogen, destroying prime farmland for carbon capture, injecting our meat with fart reducing poisons, eliminating our reliable, safe, and affordable energy sources for chasing windmills like Don Quixote in the dead of winter, injecting us with m-rna poison that killed lab animals for 20 years, unleashing the censorship industrial complex upon us and sentencing an Irish school teacher to over a year in prison for not using the correct gender pronoun of which there are 53, etc..
In order to better understand the Fourth Industrial Revolution and its global public-private partnerships is not a benign cancer, but a very lethal metastatic cancer, read this website that 14,000 city leaders are signing their communities up to without their “informed consent” (as Reagan would say, “there you go again”).
Did any of you vote to limit your amount of meat, caloric intake, articles of clothing allotted per month? I didn’t think so. Now as for prioritization (and memory retention) here are my suggestions.
1) We frame our struggle correctly, as did Lincoln, as The Divine Right of Kings (WEF) versus the Common Right of Humanity (Declaration of Independence principles adherents).
2) We neutralize the inherent strengths of the Divine Right of Kings forces which is their expertise in each manufactured crisis area (transnational governance, pandemic preparedness and vaccines, food, energy, 15 minute cities, etc.) and we match up our “Common Rights” experts in each area to break down these societal “mental spike proteins” because us laypersons are incapable of it by ourselves particularly when they are hitting us all at the same time like Baghdad.
3) We organize an organization called the Common Right of Humanity and appoint a Board of Directors (like civilian Generals) who study the battle front, appoint expert Colonels to lead the fight on each battle front (Healthcare, Energy, Food, C40, Election Integrity, etc,.)
4) Establish a Common Right of Humanity website where us laypersons can fund this war of freedom decided by the “invisible experts” with a $5 donation and a Map of the Battlefield on how we are doing against the Divine Right of Kings and their global public-private forces.
5) As Lincoln said, our problems are new so we must think anew.
I live what you are doing, but I must call out unprofessional behavior. Be more careful and accurate with your headlines. Someone from Ireland is not Ireland. I would expect more accuracy from a fourth-grader. 11 countries do not yet demand immediate suspension Covid-19 shots. Scientists and experts and politicians from 11 different countries do. They have not yet moved the needle to affect any change whatsoever. One county in Idaho has banned the Covid-19 shots. A few small areas in Australia have taken meaningful action against the Covid-19 shots. That’s it so far.
Using entire countries in headlines to represent collective calls for action is not only a common journalistic practice but also an example of effective and responsible reporting. Headlines like “Nations Call for Reform” or “Countries Demand Accountability” encapsulate the momentum of public sentiment and advocacy efforts within a nation, ensuring that critical issues are communicated with clarity and urgency. This practice, rooted in consensus framing, is a hallmark of good journalism, as it simplifies complex dynamics to make them accessible to a broader audience without misrepresenting the underlying message.
Good journalism is about amplifying significant voices and highlighting the broader implications of public movements. When advocacy groups, civil society organizations, and significant portions of the population mobilize around an issue, framing their actions as representative of the nation as a whole is both accurate and impactful. It draws attention to the scale of the movement and the urgency of the issue, ensuring it resonates with both local and international audiences.
This approach is particularly valuable in today’s fast-paced media environment, where concise, engaging headlines are essential for cutting through information overload. By framing an issue as a national or global effort, journalists emphasize the collective nature of the call to action, fostering a sense of unity and shared responsibility. Social media further amplifies these headlines, turning them into rallying points for broader public engagement and pressure on decision-makers.
Far from being misleading, this practice reflects journalistic integrity by prioritizing the amplification of voices that might otherwise be overlooked. It ensures that public movements and advocacy efforts are not lost in the noise of institutional narratives. Using collective language in headlines is not just effective—it is a necessary tool for journalists committed to informing the public, spotlighting critical issues, and driving meaningful discourse. This is what good journalism looks like: representing the voices that matter, making them impossible to ignore, and pushing important issues to the forefront of public consciousness.
“Progress: We've progressed from a generation of experts that graduated from hiding under their desks, to a generation of experts hiding behind their desks."
Just because the vaccine industry is protected from liability in the US, is that true for all the countries? What about the harm it's done and the deaths it's caused? Can other countries hold them liable?
Also, since Pfizer and Moderna lied (they knew it was not safe or effective), doesn't that take away the liability shield ?
I don't mean to be a buzz kill, but it's been almost 5 years. Even if we manage to get them withdrawn, we cant treat it as a victory. Let's get the legal immunity withdrawn from vaccines, then we wouldn't have to fight them to withdraw anything unsafe, they would withdraw it themselves.
Funny, Dr. Boyle is an American citizen and college Professor but no buy-in from the US?? Makes one wonder. I know there are legislators, Doctors and Researchers in the US that would gladly sign on to this letter.
https://rumble.com/v5tlsjn-the-silver-bullet-an-address-by-dr.-mike-yeadon-ex-vp-pfizer.html
The executive staff employed by 'vaccine' manufacturers should be arrested and indicted for multiple acts of Murder in the First Degree. Forensic data implicate these products as intentional bio-weapons, and executive staff knew the consequences before hand.
That said: Here's an alternative designed to deflect medical 'experts' from pushing victims into the vaccine trap. You must read and understand the document. The *intention* of the Notice is to place *direct liability* on the provider of the vaccine product.
Quoted from the form: - CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF VACCINATION - - AGREEMENT BETWEEN VACCINE PROVIDERS AND VACCINATED PARTY -
Opening Statement: “Herein the terms “administration” and “administrators” refers to all parties providing and/or “mandating” vaccine services and products including vaccine Manufacturers, Marketers, Lobbyists, Distributors, Hospitals, Clinics, Physicians, Nurses, Government Agents and Agencies, Healthcare Providers, Elected Officials, Enforcement Persons, Agencies and Programs, and all other parties bringing “mandated” vaccines to application or to market in any way.” [End quote]
Please read and comprehend the intent of the document. https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.freedomtaker.com%2Fdownloaddocuments%2FVaccinationNotice_v3.doc&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK
An exquisitely detailed description of the mental cytokine storm unleashed upon our critical faculties and our ability to prioritize our response and resistance to the Fourth Industrial Revolution and its hundreds of global public-private partnerships and NGO’s and Young Global Graduates all backed by our tax and consumption dollars to the tune of $10 trillion dollars. And all the while, Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Larry Fink, John Kerry et al, continue to manufacture crises in order to manufacture our consent to their hostile, global, totalitarian technocracy.
What system have they spared? Our coin operated Congress, our election integrity based upon two electronic machine counting companies with checkered ownership, destroying our food supply with H5N1 injections, killing healthy farm animals, restricting the supply of nitrogen, destroying prime farmland for carbon capture, injecting our meat with fart reducing poisons, eliminating our reliable, safe, and affordable energy sources for chasing windmills like Don Quixote in the dead of winter, injecting us with m-rna poison that killed lab animals for 20 years, unleashing the censorship industrial complex upon us and sentencing an Irish school teacher to over a year in prison for not using the correct gender pronoun of which there are 53, etc..
In order to better understand the Fourth Industrial Revolution and its global public-private partnerships is not a benign cancer, but a very lethal metastatic cancer, read this website that 14,000 city leaders are signing their communities up to without their “informed consent” (as Reagan would say, “there you go again”).
Did any of you vote to limit your amount of meat, caloric intake, articles of clothing allotted per month? I didn’t think so. Now as for prioritization (and memory retention) here are my suggestions.
1) We frame our struggle correctly, as did Lincoln, as The Divine Right of Kings (WEF) versus the Common Right of Humanity (Declaration of Independence principles adherents).
2) We neutralize the inherent strengths of the Divine Right of Kings forces which is their expertise in each manufactured crisis area (transnational governance, pandemic preparedness and vaccines, food, energy, 15 minute cities, etc.) and we match up our “Common Rights” experts in each area to break down these societal “mental spike proteins” because us laypersons are incapable of it by ourselves particularly when they are hitting us all at the same time like Baghdad.
3) We organize an organization called the Common Right of Humanity and appoint a Board of Directors (like civilian Generals) who study the battle front, appoint expert Colonels to lead the fight on each battle front (Healthcare, Energy, Food, C40, Election Integrity, etc,.)
4) Establish a Common Right of Humanity website where us laypersons can fund this war of freedom decided by the “invisible experts” with a $5 donation and a Map of the Battlefield on how we are doing against the Divine Right of Kings and their global public-private forces.
5) As Lincoln said, our problems are new so we must think anew.
c40knowledgehub.org
C40 Knowledge Community
Will they do this or ignore it?
I live what you are doing, but I must call out unprofessional behavior. Be more careful and accurate with your headlines. Someone from Ireland is not Ireland. I would expect more accuracy from a fourth-grader. 11 countries do not yet demand immediate suspension Covid-19 shots. Scientists and experts and politicians from 11 different countries do. They have not yet moved the needle to affect any change whatsoever. One county in Idaho has banned the Covid-19 shots. A few small areas in Australia have taken meaningful action against the Covid-19 shots. That’s it so far.
Hi Bill. Thank you for the feedback.
Using entire countries in headlines to represent collective calls for action is not only a common journalistic practice but also an example of effective and responsible reporting. Headlines like “Nations Call for Reform” or “Countries Demand Accountability” encapsulate the momentum of public sentiment and advocacy efforts within a nation, ensuring that critical issues are communicated with clarity and urgency. This practice, rooted in consensus framing, is a hallmark of good journalism, as it simplifies complex dynamics to make them accessible to a broader audience without misrepresenting the underlying message.
Good journalism is about amplifying significant voices and highlighting the broader implications of public movements. When advocacy groups, civil society organizations, and significant portions of the population mobilize around an issue, framing their actions as representative of the nation as a whole is both accurate and impactful. It draws attention to the scale of the movement and the urgency of the issue, ensuring it resonates with both local and international audiences.
This approach is particularly valuable in today’s fast-paced media environment, where concise, engaging headlines are essential for cutting through information overload. By framing an issue as a national or global effort, journalists emphasize the collective nature of the call to action, fostering a sense of unity and shared responsibility. Social media further amplifies these headlines, turning them into rallying points for broader public engagement and pressure on decision-makers.
Far from being misleading, this practice reflects journalistic integrity by prioritizing the amplification of voices that might otherwise be overlooked. It ensures that public movements and advocacy efforts are not lost in the noise of institutional narratives. Using collective language in headlines is not just effective—it is a necessary tool for journalists committed to informing the public, spotlighting critical issues, and driving meaningful discourse. This is what good journalism looks like: representing the voices that matter, making them impossible to ignore, and pushing important issues to the forefront of public consciousness.
Hope this helps! Have a great day. -Jon
Yup... A lie is a lie...
“Progress: We've progressed from a generation of experts that graduated from hiding under their desks, to a generation of experts hiding behind their desks."
- Paul Vonharnish - (3/14/2022)
Just because the vaccine industry is protected from liability in the US, is that true for all the countries? What about the harm it's done and the deaths it's caused? Can other countries hold them liable?
Also, since Pfizer and Moderna lied (they knew it was not safe or effective), doesn't that take away the liability shield ?
Lying is rewarded. Telling the truth is punished. Just sayin'