'You Are Placed on Formal Notice': Doctor Demands Obstetricians, Gynecologists Halt COVID-19 Vaccine Use in Pregnancy
"[Y]ou will be subject to Civil and/or Criminal charges for negligence, intent to harm, assault / battery and murder," Dr. Thorp posted on X (Twitter).
In a bold move to protect patient health, Dr. James Thorp, a prominent Obstetrician and Maternal Fetal Medicine specialist, has issued a stark warning to leading medical organizations regarding the administration of COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women.
Follow Jon Fleetwood on Instagram @realjonfleetwood / Twitter @JonMFleetwood
Taking to X (formerly Twitter), Dr. Thorp, with over four decades of experience in obstetrics, issued a formal notice to the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Board of ObGyn (ABOG), and the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), demanding an immediate cessation of COVID vaccine usage in pregnancy.
“You are placed on formal notice. You must call for an immediate moratorium on the use of the COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ in pregnancy or you will be subject to Civil and/or Criminal charges for negligence, intent to harm, assault / battery and murder,” Dr. Thorp’s message reads.
Citing evidence from peer-reviewed medical journals, Thorp brought up the link between the coronavirus jabs and adverse outcomes in pregnant women.
“There is now overwhelming published literature of over 3000 peer-reviewed medical journal articles associating death and injuries from these alleged vaccines,” he said.
Furthermore, he contends that the vaccines are, in fact, “gene therapies,” a statement he supports with a recent article in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG).
ACOG, ABOG, and SMFM were accused of collusion and financial impropriety.
Dr. Thorp accused these organizations of receiving “large sums of money” from governmental health agencies and engaging in what he described as “apparent illegal cooperative care contracts.”
Follow Jon Fleetwood on Instagram @realjonfleetwood / Twitter @JonMFleetwood
He alleges that these organizations had threatened their constituents to adhere to a narrative promoting COVID vaccination under punitive measures, which he argues was a violation of the First Amendment.
The crux of Dr. Thorp’s argument lay in the potential long-term consequences of the mRNA vaccines, suggesting that they could be “[reverse] transcribed permanently into the human genome.”
Urging an immediate global moratorium, he states, “The overwhelming literature published - well in excess of 3000 manuscripts documenting the death and severe injuries from the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ necessitates an IMMEDIATE GLOBAL MORATORIUM.”
In his Twitter post, Dr. Thorp estimates that “585 million global citizens” had been “killed or injured from the COVID-19 ‘vaccines,’” accusing ACOG, ABOG, and SMFM of causing “massive harm to pregnant women, preborns, and newborns on a global scale.”
The gravity of Dr. Thorp’s allegations and demands will undoubtedly spark significant debate within the medical community.
As the discourse continues, obstetricians, gynecologists, and medical organizations will have to contend with the scientific data Thorp references.
Follow Jon Fleetwood on Instagram @realjonfleetwood / Twitter @JonMFleetwood
"Urging an immediate global moratorium, he states, “The overwhelming literature published - well in excess of 3000 manuscripts documenting the death and severe injuries from the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ necessitates an IMMEDIATE GLOBAL MORATORIUM.”"
Far more manuscripts than 3000 are in the published literature. My recent Op-ed on adverse health effects following Covid-19 vaccinations (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/adverse-effects-following-covid-19-vaccinations-as-reported-in-the-pubmedmedline-literature-update-and-expansion.-5d876b25) analyzed 12,000+ relevant Pubmed articles, and concluded: "The 12,000+ relevant articles retrieved for the present Op-ed and focused on adverse events following the Covid-19 vaccinations should be viewed as a very low “floor” of what exists in Pubmed. More articles could have been retrieved from a well-resourced study. Additionally, because of Pubmed proximity search limitations, the Abstracts were not searched to the full extent possible.
Because of the aforementioned censorship of the biomedical literature, credible papers on Covid-19 vaccination side-effects were retracted or rejected by the journal Editors. The number of Editorial rejections is unknown, since the public does not have access to what is submitted to the journals, and what fraction is accepted. Thus, the Pubmed published literature represents a fraction of the post-Covid-19 vaccination adverse events research has identified."
My nursing student just had an emergent C-Section - 26 weeks. Baby then developed a brain hemorrhage. It’s absolutely criminal!