Despite low antibody detection possibly attributable to false positives or passive immunity, U.S. agency pushes expanded testing and surveillance, fueling concerns over inflated H5N1 case numbers.
Inflated false positives is what they want. It is what they did with COVID too. Like Dr. Mullis said if you cycle PCR enough times you can obtain whatever result you want. He also said PCR cannot detect illness. Antibodies only means the animal may have come in contact with bird flu in their lifetime. It surely doesn't mean they are sick or contagious. This is a direct and planned attack on our food source. One of the goals of UN Agenda 21 is to get rid of all large hoofed animals, paddocks, fencing, modern agricultural equipment and much more. The UN Global Biodiversity Assessment lists all the things that must be ended......private property, ski slopes, dams, population growth, consumerism just to name a few more on the list. There is a lot more.
Except PCR testing is not the test used in this example. When ever you see "antibodies found," that's a different test entirely. PCR is looking for tiny fragments of DNA, and magnifying those through cycle after cycle which can easily go too far and give false positives.
Morality went out the window a long time ago when they stopped farmers, dairyman, cattlemen from treating their livestock by making antibiotics unavailable to them without an RX. There is a lack of humanity when vets and government colluded to remove antibiotics from feed store shelves falsely claiming that human antibiotic resistance was caused by antibiotics being used in cattle. When it costs more to get a vet to your farm to treat an animal with antibiotics than the worth of the animal is, the animal suffers.
A lot of our problems come from humans not being able to resist financial incentivation. It is an evolutionary disadvantage. Commend children who can resist eating the first marshmallow all you want. I think it's the same reasoning that makes homo oeconomicus show desired behavior to obtain a second marshmallow, that also makes them feel happy and fulfilled when hunting-gathering injections or subsidized products or gift vouchers from CDC, whatever it takes, no matter what the downstream consequences will be for them and the tribe. The 2nd marshmallow children show only malleability.
“Which raises the question: is this about public health, or manufacturing a narrative to justify more surveillance and intervention?”
Is there anything the powerful do that isn’t about justifying more surveillance and control? The pattern is getting really obvious guys!
1. Decide on outcome desired by the powerful
2. Create fear campaign to scare people into complying with the desired outcome
3. Implement the desired outcome as if it’s the only possible solution
4. Wait a bit
5. Repeat.
Sometimes they get a little fancy with it and pretend the desired outcome isn’t being adopted (like when they pretended health DARPA was going away), but then they just quietly change the name and continue on (like when they stopped calling it HARPA and started calling it Arpa-H).
Fear mongering, when done by anyone who has a financial interest in the proposed solution, should be illegal!
While I'm on the same page with the possible "hype the case numbers" scenario, you're calling out "passive immunity" wrongly. Please look it up. Passive means your body did nothing to produce the antibodies. That happens with colostrum when you're 24 hours or less old and it happens via the placenta while in the womb. More unlikely: you got a blood transfusion that happened to have antibodies in it.
Anything else, including "environmental exposure" is, by definition not passive, but active immunity.
Health care, as if there is any money in Health, well maybe in the supplement scam, but that's a pimple on a flees dick compared to sic care, avoid the doctor, given half a chance he will kill you
Inflated false positives is what they want. It is what they did with COVID too. Like Dr. Mullis said if you cycle PCR enough times you can obtain whatever result you want. He also said PCR cannot detect illness. Antibodies only means the animal may have come in contact with bird flu in their lifetime. It surely doesn't mean they are sick or contagious. This is a direct and planned attack on our food source. One of the goals of UN Agenda 21 is to get rid of all large hoofed animals, paddocks, fencing, modern agricultural equipment and much more. The UN Global Biodiversity Assessment lists all the things that must be ended......private property, ski slopes, dams, population growth, consumerism just to name a few more on the list. There is a lot more.
Except PCR testing is not the test used in this example. When ever you see "antibodies found," that's a different test entirely. PCR is looking for tiny fragments of DNA, and magnifying those through cycle after cycle which can easily go too far and give false positives.
Uh-oh. Now it becomes a question of morality. Do any of these vets have any?
Remember these vets have been shooting gene therapy into animals small and large, so we can assume that morals are in the rear view mirror
Assumed!
Morality went out the window a long time ago when they stopped farmers, dairyman, cattlemen from treating their livestock by making antibiotics unavailable to them without an RX. There is a lack of humanity when vets and government colluded to remove antibiotics from feed store shelves falsely claiming that human antibiotic resistance was caused by antibiotics being used in cattle. When it costs more to get a vet to your farm to treat an animal with antibiotics than the worth of the animal is, the animal suffers.
Is it that impossible to indict this man for all his known malfeasance?
No test, no pandemic!!
A lot of our problems come from humans not being able to resist financial incentivation. It is an evolutionary disadvantage. Commend children who can resist eating the first marshmallow all you want. I think it's the same reasoning that makes homo oeconomicus show desired behavior to obtain a second marshmallow, that also makes them feel happy and fulfilled when hunting-gathering injections or subsidized products or gift vouchers from CDC, whatever it takes, no matter what the downstream consequences will be for them and the tribe. The 2nd marshmallow children show only malleability.
When will he fall off the edge of the flat earth and do us all a solid?
Those cow vets should have told them where to put those gift cards.
“Which raises the question: is this about public health, or manufacturing a narrative to justify more surveillance and intervention?”
Is there anything the powerful do that isn’t about justifying more surveillance and control? The pattern is getting really obvious guys!
1. Decide on outcome desired by the powerful
2. Create fear campaign to scare people into complying with the desired outcome
3. Implement the desired outcome as if it’s the only possible solution
4. Wait a bit
5. Repeat.
Sometimes they get a little fancy with it and pretend the desired outcome isn’t being adopted (like when they pretended health DARPA was going away), but then they just quietly change the name and continue on (like when they stopped calling it HARPA and started calling it Arpa-H).
Fear mongering, when done by anyone who has a financial interest in the proposed solution, should be illegal!
While I'm on the same page with the possible "hype the case numbers" scenario, you're calling out "passive immunity" wrongly. Please look it up. Passive means your body did nothing to produce the antibodies. That happens with colostrum when you're 24 hours or less old and it happens via the placenta while in the womb. More unlikely: you got a blood transfusion that happened to have antibodies in it.
Anything else, including "environmental exposure" is, by definition not passive, but active immunity.
.
My favorite parts of Covid:
#89
Waiting …
For Life Insurance Companies
To Announce GoFundMe Accounts
.
HARDCORE TRUTH, EVIDENCE & INSIGHT! There is no virus
https://talknet.substack.com/p/hardcore-truth-evidence-and-insight
Health care, as if there is any money in Health, well maybe in the supplement scam, but that's a pimple on a flees dick compared to sic care, avoid the doctor, given half a chance he will kill you
NUREMBERG ROPES FOR BILL AND MELINDA GATES +++ END BIOWEAPON FAMINE PROGRAM IN FOOD SUPPLY USA !!! 2025
Now that we all know that many doctors were payed off by Pharma…they’re off to bribe the vets?