PROPHECY, ADEPT, P3, PREEMPT, and DEFUSE appear to form successive layers of a U.S. military infrastructure capable of orchestrating pandemics and rapidly deploying imposed countermeasures.
"The U.S. military appears to have spent a decade constructing the computer sequence-based predictive, surveillance"
"surveillance": The quote below was from "The Emergence of a NanoBot Society" - How NanoBots Change Medicine TEDMED Israel 2013 (Dr. Ido Bachelet) (Source)
"This syringe has inside it 1,000 billion robots. To make sure we don't lose control over the nanobots after they're injected, my team has developed nanorobots that carry antennas. These antennas are made from metal nanoparticles. Now, the antennas enable the nanobots to respond to externally applied electromagnetic fields (EMFs). These nanorobots can be activated with the press of a button on a joystick or an Xbox. The controller actually links the nanobots to the (internet) network...
So they have an actual IP address, and they can be accessed from a remote device sitting on the same network, for example, my doctor's smartphone. Every part of our nanorobots, moving parts, axis, locks, chassis, software, everything is made from DNA molecules." End quote
Yes, yes, yes... now you're onto it: "accepted as a virus"
"It is the digital (in silico) sequence architecture accepted as a virus, and the vast machinery capable of converting that architecture into PCR targets, purported cases, surveillance data, computational variants, pharmaceutical products, and emergency policy."
Seems like we're on the same page, Elizabeth. Even if we grant that viruses do exist (I'm not claiming they do or do not right here right now—just for argument), the system DARPA has built can enable and sustain pandemics without requiring their existence. And by pandemics, I really mean government response to a purported outbreak. Which we remember from COVID brought masks, social distancing, lockdowns, coercive vaccination, iatrogenic death, vaccine injury, etc.
PROPHECY — let's make a genetic sequence for a pathogen that DOES IS NOT CONFIRMED TO EXIST
ADEPT — let's make a vaccine based on genetic sequences, which ARE NOT THEMSELVES VIRUSES
P3 — let's compress the time between genetic sequence acquisition and vaccine development, none of which requires a physical virus, just a sequence and manufacturing
PREEMPT — let's find those genetic sequences in nature, USING FAULTY PCR TESTS (that can be gamed to give you any outcome you want, per the inventor)
Again—not making a claim ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OR NOT of viruses. But the DARPA system can enable "pandemics" without them, because that's what their programs from 2010 onward sought to do. Of course all of the projects present viruses as if they do in fact exist, but that's not the point. The point is whether the system requires them. And I'm finding that it does not.
Yes, they have built a system which does not require viruses. The viruses are assumed to exist. Leaps of logic are made to fit everything into the virus narrative. This narrative allows the business model to continue, and those using the model are not going to call it out. It's a Sword & Shield model of virus & vaccine where the shield can be made first (and is not really a shield). The promoters attempt to shame us all into believing that this is THE science.
Concerning your section on PREEMPT above, I would say it differently: PCR is not actually a test; "lab technique" might be a better term, or simply "PCR." Also, it is not inherently faulty, but definitely can be gamed... and it was!
The virus is the vector for the gene therapies. It is a means to an end.
DARPA wants to make synthetic immune systems and synthetic genomes, and to manufacture drugs inside your body on demand. See the Living Sentinel and Living Pharmacy tracks of the REACT program.
There is no virus - it’s a construct to fool you into getting an injection. How many will fall for the same bs when almost nobody is taking the current covid jab?
Believe what you want. Nobody should be forced, coerced, or defrauded into making a decision that could harm them, and everyone should be granted informed consent, ethically, morally, and legally.
What happened during covid was global communism and a hostile takeover by global government using elements within all nations- a global coup de etat from inside every nation from the top down (national govt) as well as the bottom up (city and state).
This is why I always believed and said that mRNA would not be allowed to fail. Too much was invested in bringing it to fruition. The question remains. Did Covid come about in order to bring mRNA online? It’s too horrifying to consider that as a possibility.
An even darker thought: was the mRNA actually designed for other purposes - like to get bodies into the Internet of Things - and the entire project to find and back engineer viruses, predict sequences, etc., was itself created only to serve as a cover of plausible deniability to hide an even deeper agenda that the jabs were designed to carry out? In other words, could the dirt you’ve done such a fantastic job of digging out (thank you!) be just the layer designed to hide something even worse. Would that be possible?
Okay, but to what end(s)? Is this purely a profit play for the pharmaceutical companies, i.e. the looting of the treasury to insiders? Or is this a weapon against removing unfavorable leadership? That would be a stretch since pandemics (global) are brush fires that could burn up all sorts of stuff and kick off a lot of chaos. Or is depopulation an actual motive? That, too, strains credulity because of many, many confounding factors. Making the global population overall sicker and thus younger could, in theory, reduce nations' social welfare burdens but, again, this would only work if the largest nations have replacement populations waiting in the wings. Extrapolating further, sure, you can import Muslims and Africans into your countries but this is a disaster of a different sort.
I did not read all of your article, just the opening and closing, so if you spelled out a motive I would be happy to know a one-sentence version that is not simply conspiratorial conjecture.
Imagine the development of a powerful tool, like a knife or a gun, that can be used to hunt and harvest food. As the tool continues to be developed by many well meaning people, other forces come into play. Some people want to develop the technology along different lines for law enforcement, which of course leads to others using it for crimes - and then wars. As this is occurring, the process shifts gradually from hunting and harvesting food to supplying computer controlled killer drones to both sides of a conflict for financial and for political gain.
It's not difficult to imagine that, what started out as a "pandemic protection" activity could simultaneously drift into serving many other objectives while - at the same time - being seen by most participants as an activity and development necessary to keep us all safe.
How to fight this type of drift? I think we need to stick with fundamental human rights. Upholding and improving our ability to support individual human rights is a primary. However, it is not sufficient.
Humans live in communities. Every human lives in many changing communities throughout their lives.
Communities have rights. We treat corporations as "individuals" and recognize that any community, even that if me, myself and I, can form a corporate entity. An individual.
When we speak of individual human rights, we also sometimes speak of responsibilities. We need to develop similar conceps for all community, not just corporate communities.
Today, we have no theory of community, no philosophy of community, only the natural ",practice" of communities. And this is a problem, because communities have no peers, so communities have no morals. We need to develop community morals. For the health of it.
Let’s not forget Dr Michael Callahan ( still has privileges at Massachusetts General Hospital ) who started out as an infectious disease/tropical medicine specialist and was actually over in Wuhan for the beginning of the pandemic. I’m sure he is still lining his pockets from the Covid and vaccine deaths. Makes me sick to my stomach
Thank you for this unparalleled research history. Truly the weaponization of healthcare by the military. Bottom line: The virus is not found in nature, cannot be observed in da petri dish under a microscope, but is a virtual computer generated sequence, and everything flows from that. SHOCKING!
This is ground zero. This is the seminal event that generated the Covid con!
This is what the the world should know and this is what needs to be put to rest and never emerge again.
You're the best. Excellent researcher! Thank you for helping to keep us informed!
Very kind of you—thank you!
Lest we forget Smith Mundt Act allowig for domestic propaganda under Obama.
Thank you. This is the best explanation of how Plandemics work that I’ve read.
Thanks! I think once we see all the DARPA projects lined up like this, it becomes self-evident what's going on. IMO
Jon, your bloodhound detective work is beyond EXCELLENT!
We live in a world of such deception that most will never see this as the MOTB because of false eschatology!
If you ever get a chance, check out the facts of this...
https://www.revelation1823.net/mark-of-the-beast
Go to the very first chapter -Eschatology, and you will see.
Be blessed, my brother!
"The U.S. military appears to have spent a decade constructing the computer sequence-based predictive, surveillance"
"surveillance": The quote below was from "The Emergence of a NanoBot Society" - How NanoBots Change Medicine TEDMED Israel 2013 (Dr. Ido Bachelet) (Source)
"This syringe has inside it 1,000 billion robots. To make sure we don't lose control over the nanobots after they're injected, my team has developed nanorobots that carry antennas. These antennas are made from metal nanoparticles. Now, the antennas enable the nanobots to respond to externally applied electromagnetic fields (EMFs). These nanorobots can be activated with the press of a button on a joystick or an Xbox. The controller actually links the nanobots to the (internet) network...
So they have an actual IP address, and they can be accessed from a remote device sitting on the same network, for example, my doctor's smartphone. Every part of our nanorobots, moving parts, axis, locks, chassis, software, everything is made from DNA molecules." End quote
Source: revelation1823.net
Make no mistake... mRNA MARKS you as in the MOTB, while connecting you to the IoB (Internet of Bodies) for the up-and-coming Digital Slave Race!
Thank you, Jon!
Yes, yes, yes... now you're onto it: "accepted as a virus"
"It is the digital (in silico) sequence architecture accepted as a virus, and the vast machinery capable of converting that architecture into PCR targets, purported cases, surveillance data, computational variants, pharmaceutical products, and emergency policy."
Seems like we're on the same page, Elizabeth. Even if we grant that viruses do exist (I'm not claiming they do or do not right here right now—just for argument), the system DARPA has built can enable and sustain pandemics without requiring their existence. And by pandemics, I really mean government response to a purported outbreak. Which we remember from COVID brought masks, social distancing, lockdowns, coercive vaccination, iatrogenic death, vaccine injury, etc.
PROPHECY — let's make a genetic sequence for a pathogen that DOES IS NOT CONFIRMED TO EXIST
ADEPT — let's make a vaccine based on genetic sequences, which ARE NOT THEMSELVES VIRUSES
P3 — let's compress the time between genetic sequence acquisition and vaccine development, none of which requires a physical virus, just a sequence and manufacturing
PREEMPT — let's find those genetic sequences in nature, USING FAULTY PCR TESTS (that can be gamed to give you any outcome you want, per the inventor)
Again—not making a claim ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OR NOT of viruses. But the DARPA system can enable "pandemics" without them, because that's what their programs from 2010 onward sought to do. Of course all of the projects present viruses as if they do in fact exist, but that's not the point. The point is whether the system requires them. And I'm finding that it does not.
Is that how you're seeing it, too?
Yes, they have built a system which does not require viruses. The viruses are assumed to exist. Leaps of logic are made to fit everything into the virus narrative. This narrative allows the business model to continue, and those using the model are not going to call it out. It's a Sword & Shield model of virus & vaccine where the shield can be made first (and is not really a shield). The promoters attempt to shame us all into believing that this is THE science.
Concerning your section on PREEMPT above, I would say it differently: PCR is not actually a test; "lab technique" might be a better term, or simply "PCR." Also, it is not inherently faulty, but definitely can be gamed... and it was!
The virus is the vector for the gene therapies. It is a means to an end.
DARPA wants to make synthetic immune systems and synthetic genomes, and to manufacture drugs inside your body on demand. See the Living Sentinel and Living Pharmacy tracks of the REACT program.
There is no virus - it’s a construct to fool you into getting an injection. How many will fall for the same bs when almost nobody is taking the current covid jab?
Believe what you want. Nobody should be forced, coerced, or defrauded into making a decision that could harm them, and everyone should be granted informed consent, ethically, morally, and legally.
What happened during covid was global communism and a hostile takeover by global government using elements within all nations- a global coup de etat from inside every nation from the top down (national govt) as well as the bottom up (city and state).
This is why I always believed and said that mRNA would not be allowed to fail. Too much was invested in bringing it to fruition. The question remains. Did Covid come about in order to bring mRNA online? It’s too horrifying to consider that as a possibility.
yes, covid was made for the jab.....jab first then the so called virus to my understanding
DARPA: devil in disguise 🥸
The same infiltration of evil scum that killed JFK, RFK, JFK Jr, MLK, Kirk & many more......💵💀
read the thread
https://substack.com/@chronodamus/note/c-291340067
An even darker thought: was the mRNA actually designed for other purposes - like to get bodies into the Internet of Things - and the entire project to find and back engineer viruses, predict sequences, etc., was itself created only to serve as a cover of plausible deniability to hide an even deeper agenda that the jabs were designed to carry out? In other words, could the dirt you’ve done such a fantastic job of digging out (thank you!) be just the layer designed to hide something even worse. Would that be possible?
Okay, but to what end(s)? Is this purely a profit play for the pharmaceutical companies, i.e. the looting of the treasury to insiders? Or is this a weapon against removing unfavorable leadership? That would be a stretch since pandemics (global) are brush fires that could burn up all sorts of stuff and kick off a lot of chaos. Or is depopulation an actual motive? That, too, strains credulity because of many, many confounding factors. Making the global population overall sicker and thus younger could, in theory, reduce nations' social welfare burdens but, again, this would only work if the largest nations have replacement populations waiting in the wings. Extrapolating further, sure, you can import Muslims and Africans into your countries but this is a disaster of a different sort.
I did not read all of your article, just the opening and closing, so if you spelled out a motive I would be happy to know a one-sentence version that is not simply conspiratorial conjecture.
Imagine the development of a powerful tool, like a knife or a gun, that can be used to hunt and harvest food. As the tool continues to be developed by many well meaning people, other forces come into play. Some people want to develop the technology along different lines for law enforcement, which of course leads to others using it for crimes - and then wars. As this is occurring, the process shifts gradually from hunting and harvesting food to supplying computer controlled killer drones to both sides of a conflict for financial and for political gain.
It's not difficult to imagine that, what started out as a "pandemic protection" activity could simultaneously drift into serving many other objectives while - at the same time - being seen by most participants as an activity and development necessary to keep us all safe.
How to fight this type of drift? I think we need to stick with fundamental human rights. Upholding and improving our ability to support individual human rights is a primary. However, it is not sufficient.
Humans live in communities. Every human lives in many changing communities throughout their lives.
Communities have rights. We treat corporations as "individuals" and recognize that any community, even that if me, myself and I, can form a corporate entity. An individual.
When we speak of individual human rights, we also sometimes speak of responsibilities. We need to develop similar conceps for all community, not just corporate communities.
Today, we have no theory of community, no philosophy of community, only the natural ",practice" of communities. And this is a problem, because communities have no peers, so communities have no morals. We need to develop community morals. For the health of it.
Let’s not forget Dr Michael Callahan ( still has privileges at Massachusetts General Hospital ) who started out as an infectious disease/tropical medicine specialist and was actually over in Wuhan for the beginning of the pandemic. I’m sure he is still lining his pockets from the Covid and vaccine deaths. Makes me sick to my stomach
Thank you for this unparalleled research history. Truly the weaponization of healthcare by the military. Bottom line: The virus is not found in nature, cannot be observed in da petri dish under a microscope, but is a virtual computer generated sequence, and everything flows from that. SHOCKING!
Thing is, regardless of everything said, the vaxxed caught covid anyway. Many multiple times. At best mRNA didn’t work. At worst it was harmful.