"At this stage, we must accept Plaintiffs' allegations that the vaccine does not prevent the spread of COVID-19 as true," court opinion reads.
So, this begs the question: How can a person be "vaccine hesitant" in reference to a product that is NOT a vaccine?...enjoying the clown world?
true journalism. great analysis of the case and related / implicated evidence + prior rulings.
TY!!
Thank you 🙏
If this stands this is huge. Any school or body that slapped a covid19 jab on their mandated vaccination schedule would have to withdraw it, I would think.
So, this begs the question: How can a person be "vaccine hesitant" in reference to a product that is NOT a vaccine?...enjoying the clown world?
true journalism. great analysis of the case and related / implicated evidence + prior rulings.
TY!!
Thank you 🙏
If this stands this is huge. Any school or body that slapped a covid19 jab on their mandated vaccination schedule would have to withdraw it, I would think.