U.S. government funded a decades-long coronavirus genetics enterprise built upon interpretations, not direct empirical observation—later inherited by Ralph Baric’s coronavirus engineering program.
I found the exact same thing when I researched bird flu. The same guys who were making juiced up human-bird flus also concocted a natural human-bird flu story, with the help of the WHO and in service of Gilead (Tamiflu & Remdesivir): https://scamerica.substack.com/p/because-of-superinfection-exclusion
The gain of function story is a false alternative that instills fear of future pandemics. Why would China let our government agencies to play in their labs? We are not allies, especially with the Taiwan situation.
Data shows that the total death rate did not increase much until 2021, when the shots came out.
As for viruses, they are measuring a result, not the cause.
The virus is a result of damage and buildup of cellular debris. That's why it has human DNA segments.
But it is not the cause of the disease. Allopathic medicine has it backwards.
The fairytale of naturally recombining viruses, the COVID-19 origin story where someone with a human coronavirus gets exposed to a bat coronavirus and the two viruses combine within them to create a new human-bat coronavirus that causes a pandemic because no one has immunity is countered by a simple and well-known fact of virology: superinfection exclusion. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.26.634807v1
Outstanding research. Thank you. The average person will probably not understand all of the details, but getting the message out, that as with climate "science" the narrative is based on computer models, not real world observation, should enable smarter choices by the public.
Another great article - I've been sending them to The Highwire. The bottom line is - the CPE process itself is pseudoscientific, i.e, it is inferred that the pleomorphic reaction to monkey cells, bovine serum, antibiotics, trypsin, etc. (Toxification) plus then starving the petri dish brew for 72 hours (nutrient deficiency) creates a "cytopathic effect" (decomposing dying cell), and this is claimed to be proof of "virus," They have never shown that these "qualified"/infered particles cause the disease they claim they do. Microzyme, pleomorphism etc. history and science -
This BS CPE "isolation" method is accepted by new virologists, immunologists, vaccinologists, Health Freedom Movement "experts," etc., etc. This is then used as justification to inject monkey cells, bovine serum, and other toxic crap into the public ("immunizers" - BS). When a child then doesn't get the illness they are allegedly "immunized" against, no one considers that their detoxing pathway has been compromised. If they get the illness, then genome (matching/alignment) is done against the alleged "vaccine strain," and so this "ownership" is then perceived as another "qualifier" of the existence of "virus." Wow - it's all so brilliant how none of this gets questioned.
What you are putting together is the next layer to the inferred pseudoscience - which finally ends in a Computer Sequence that ill patients' mucosal samples are tested against, i.e., the amino acids within their mucosal samples are matched/aligned/constructed against.
If one was planning to have people's samples matched, one could set the PCR test cycle to between 35 - 45 (2020 on), one could introduce a specific toxin that has amino acids that could help the sequencing algorythem align, or one could use an Electromagnetic frequency to induce an amino acid change within the population - graphen oxide in masks may help this EMF process (just a theory).
The Jab All crooks' problem was that they created a Computer Sequence (SARS-CoV-2) that couldn't be constructed without the algorithm matching system. As I recall, when Lanka did his "virus isolation" control test using yeast (yeast occures during the detox stage) instead of a sick person's mucosal sample, he got a match to SARS-CoV-2, but when he (they) tried to reproduce this computer sequence that had both the furin cleaver and HIVgp120 sequences within the so-called "spike protein" sequence - they couldn't recreate/reconstuct it i.e. it was likely done in silico (refered to in your other articles).
Most people don't know how the "spike protein" was created within the CPE process using monkey cells and trypsin, i.e., this BS claim/inferance that it's a part of the "coronavirus" (their name/brand given to their creation) is another part of the inference/pseudoscience chain.
wE MAY INFER, SOMEHOW characters work are directed towards an clear ultimate goal? In say low level scientist and even main political characters, perhaps not knowingly all
You make the statement "did not directly observe" several times. Tell us a) what do you mean and expect by "direct observation" and, b) what CAN be "directly observed" at the microscopic scale of RNA? I just need to understand that you are not asking for a type of evidence which does not exist across a whole range of known-good organic chemistry before I go around repeating your critique.
The rabbit holes keep getting deeper and deeper with the lab magic tricks by these people desperately trying to create something lethal and highly pathogenic. We probably have only scratched the surface of it all.
I found the exact same thing when I researched bird flu. The same guys who were making juiced up human-bird flus also concocted a natural human-bird flu story, with the help of the WHO and in service of Gilead (Tamiflu & Remdesivir): https://scamerica.substack.com/p/because-of-superinfection-exclusion
Thank you, Jon!
Never quit speaking, Jon!
Your voice matters and is appreciated more than you know!
Thanks, Brian!
Of course they did. They needed to come up with some plausible explanation for the chimera they wanted to create.
The gain of function story is a false alternative that instills fear of future pandemics. Why would China let our government agencies to play in their labs? We are not allies, especially with the Taiwan situation.
Data shows that the total death rate did not increase much until 2021, when the shots came out.
As for viruses, they are measuring a result, not the cause.
The virus is a result of damage and buildup of cellular debris. That's why it has human DNA segments.
But it is not the cause of the disease. Allopathic medicine has it backwards.
https://barn0346.substack.com/p/we-are-miseducated-about-our-bodies
It's the result of science going too deep into abstract logic. https://robc137.substack.com/p/wasp-vs-bee-intelligence
The fairytale of naturally recombining viruses, the COVID-19 origin story where someone with a human coronavirus gets exposed to a bat coronavirus and the two viruses combine within them to create a new human-bat coronavirus that causes a pandemic because no one has immunity is countered by a simple and well-known fact of virology: superinfection exclusion. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.26.634807v1
I bet the scientific claim that viruses have genomes hasn't been directly observed either.
Outstanding research. Thank you. The average person will probably not understand all of the details, but getting the message out, that as with climate "science" the narrative is based on computer models, not real world observation, should enable smarter choices by the public.
Another great article - I've been sending them to The Highwire. The bottom line is - the CPE process itself is pseudoscientific, i.e, it is inferred that the pleomorphic reaction to monkey cells, bovine serum, antibiotics, trypsin, etc. (Toxification) plus then starving the petri dish brew for 72 hours (nutrient deficiency) creates a "cytopathic effect" (decomposing dying cell), and this is claimed to be proof of "virus," They have never shown that these "qualified"/infered particles cause the disease they claim they do. Microzyme, pleomorphism etc. history and science -
https://hewettinsite.substack.com/p/ah-vir-023-microzymas-somatids-and
This BS CPE "isolation" method is accepted by new virologists, immunologists, vaccinologists, Health Freedom Movement "experts," etc., etc. This is then used as justification to inject monkey cells, bovine serum, and other toxic crap into the public ("immunizers" - BS). When a child then doesn't get the illness they are allegedly "immunized" against, no one considers that their detoxing pathway has been compromised. If they get the illness, then genome (matching/alignment) is done against the alleged "vaccine strain," and so this "ownership" is then perceived as another "qualifier" of the existence of "virus." Wow - it's all so brilliant how none of this gets questioned.
What you are putting together is the next layer to the inferred pseudoscience - which finally ends in a Computer Sequence that ill patients' mucosal samples are tested against, i.e., the amino acids within their mucosal samples are matched/aligned/constructed against.
If one was planning to have people's samples matched, one could set the PCR test cycle to between 35 - 45 (2020 on), one could introduce a specific toxin that has amino acids that could help the sequencing algorythem align, or one could use an Electromagnetic frequency to induce an amino acid change within the population - graphen oxide in masks may help this EMF process (just a theory).
The Jab All crooks' problem was that they created a Computer Sequence (SARS-CoV-2) that couldn't be constructed without the algorithm matching system. As I recall, when Lanka did his "virus isolation" control test using yeast (yeast occures during the detox stage) instead of a sick person's mucosal sample, he got a match to SARS-CoV-2, but when he (they) tried to reproduce this computer sequence that had both the furin cleaver and HIVgp120 sequences within the so-called "spike protein" sequence - they couldn't recreate/reconstuct it i.e. it was likely done in silico (refered to in your other articles).
Most people don't know how the "spike protein" was created within the CPE process using monkey cells and trypsin, i.e., this BS claim/inferance that it's a part of the "coronavirus" (their name/brand given to their creation) is another part of the inference/pseudoscience chain.
I think they’ve been screwing around with this stuff for so long they just assumed they were the good guys. The banality of evil
wE MAY INFER, SOMEHOW characters work are directed towards an clear ultimate goal? In say low level scientist and even main political characters, perhaps not knowingly all
You make the statement "did not directly observe" several times. Tell us a) what do you mean and expect by "direct observation" and, b) what CAN be "directly observed" at the microscopic scale of RNA? I just need to understand that you are not asking for a type of evidence which does not exist across a whole range of known-good organic chemistry before I go around repeating your critique.
The rabbit holes keep getting deeper and deeper with the lab magic tricks by these people desperately trying to create something lethal and highly pathogenic. We probably have only scratched the surface of it all.