Washington Bill Authorizes $6 Billion Biosecurity Funding Program—Bird Flu Explicitly Named as Target Threat
Allows grant and review records to be shielded from public disclosure, raising transparency concerns.
Washington lawmakers on Tuesday introduced legislation authorizing $6 billion in taxpayer-backed funding to build a permanent state-run biosecurity and infectious disease response infrastructure, establishing a new government institute with the power to finance outbreak detection programs, biological countermeasure development, and pathogen response operations—including those targeting highly pathogenic avian influenza “bird flu.”
The move comes as bird flu programs and the countermeasures designed to address them are being built out in parallel across state, federal, and international systems.
House Bill 2739 creates the Washington Institute for Scientific Advancement, a new state entity that did not previously exist in Washington law, and empowers it to distribute billions in public funds to universities, private companies, and other organizations carrying out infectious disease programs, biological product development, and emerging threat response activities.
The program would be financed through massive new taxpayer-backed bond issuance. The legislation states:
“The state finance committee may issue general obligation bonds of the state of Washington in the sum of $6,000,000,000, or so much thereof as may be required, solely for the purpose of providing funds to advance scientific research…”
Because these are general obligation bonds, repayment is guaranteed by the state’s full financial backing, meaning taxpayers ultimately bear responsibility for the debt.
You can see which representatives are sponsoring the bill here.
Follow us on Instagram @realjonfleetwood & Twitter/X @JonMFleetwood.
If you value this reporting, consider upgrading to a paid subscription.
For advertising & sponsorship opportunities, contact us by clicking below.
Bird Flu Explicitly Named as a Justification for the New Funding Apparatus
The legislation directly identifies highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) as one of the outbreak threats used to justify creating the institute and authorizing the $6 billion funding structure.
Lawmakers are claiming that funding cuts could jeopardize the state’s ability to:
“detect, research, and conduct responses to current and future disease outbreaks such as the current highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus, rabies, tularemia, and the plague…”
New Institute Authorized to Finance Outbreak Detection, Biological Product Development, & Response Infrastructure
The Washington Institute for Scientific Advancement, created under Section 401 of the bill, would operate as the central hub for distributing the $6 billion and directing funding toward infectious disease and biological threat programs across the state.
Under the legislation, the institute is authorized to award grants to:
“public or private research companies, universities, institutes, and organizations for scientific research, development, and the construction of facilities…”
The bill specifically authorizes funding for programs involving:
Infectious diseases and emerging health threats
Detection and response to disease outbreaks
Development and evaluation of drugs and biological products
Construction of research and development facilities
Programs involving biological products, medical countermeasures, and public health threat response
The legislation also directs the institute to prioritize replacing federal funding cuts to ensure these programs continue operating.
State-Controlled Council Will Direct Billions in Biosecurity & Outbreak Funding
Funding decisions would be controlled by an appointed research council with authority to determine priorities, select grant recipients, and direct the long-term deployment of the institute’s funding.
Grant applications and related materials would be shielded from public disclosure under confidentiality protections written into the bill, raising questions about transparency and government motives.
Measure Will Be Submitted to Voters
Because the program relies on bond financing, voters must approve the measure before the funding structure can be fully implemented.
Bottom line
Washington lawmakers have introduced legislation authorizing $6 billion in taxpayer-backed funding to create a permanent state-run biosecurity and infectious disease response apparatus, with bird flu explicitly cited as one of the outbreak threats used to justify its creation.
If approved, the bill would establish a new government institute with the power to direct billions into infectious disease programs, biological countermeasure development, and outbreak response infrastructure—while allowing grant and review records tied to those activities to be shielded from public disclosure.
Follow us on Instagram @realjonfleetwood & Twitter/X @JonMFleetwood.
If you value this reporting, consider upgrading to a paid subscription.
For advertising & sponsorship opportunities, contact us by clicking below.
The Bill Gates COVID/Vaccine/Pandemic propaganda…
It reminds me of some anti-virus software programs.
Once you started the subscription,
beware if you let it expire; beware if you didn’t.
A Catch-22.
It always struck me as suspect when my computer became bogged down by anti-virus actions over the long run, even after subscription renewals until ultimately it crashed.
My question was, did the anti-virus software provider monetize the demise of my computer somehow? Thereby driving me to buy a new computer and new software? Then repeat…
Could a computer programmer turned vaccine developer translate that and profit off of it through a vast network while presenting as a philanthropist and using the phrase, “as health improves, families choose to have less children” as a cover story for the results?
Could anyone be nefarious enough to monetize population reduction while “incentivizing” huge numbers of people to self-enroll into such a scheme and then also profit off of the med-techno apparatus used to police/enforce/protect it? Would the public remain silent as it came to light and those responsible were pardoned left and right with no accountability?
That sure would make for an interesting dystopian doomsday novel, wouldn’t it?
Then there’s the Digital ID’s which equate to…
Conditional freedom predicated on constant compliance with rolling government mandates that limit a free citizen’s ability to work, buy, sell, trade, travel, get an education, or exercise any other God given rights…this is enforced by government sanctioned discrimination, ideological segregation, and blatant coercion, while using duplicitous language under a false premise.
IT’S HELL ON EARTH.
When we participate in that kind of behavior, we vet it, give it credence, and building power…WE BECOME IT and levy it on our peers.
THE ANSWER IS, NO.
Still reading?
There is also a multifaceted synergistic layered campaign for “Equity in global depopulation.”
It’s monetized and people are profiting off of it.
Look up how much the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation has invested in vaccines, planned parenthood, LGBTQ ideology, and Big Tech / AI to control and shape information. He’s not the only one…
Let’s view the deceptive equation:
Vaccines. “Safe and Effective.”
+
Planned Parenthood [abortion]. “Reproductive care.”
+
LGBTQ ideology. “Dignity and respect.” “Love is love.”
(Consider: If you were going to sterilize the next generation through their thoughts/minds, how would you do that? Does an ideology have the power to switch bloodlines OFF? Do we have ideas or do ideas have us?)
+
Censorship. “Hate Speech, misinformation/disinformation.”
=
Global population reduction. Which is monetized for profit by and for the stakeholders.
It’s ironic how they promote all of the above in western militaries and call it “readiness.”
No judgement or condemnation towards any individuals who subscribe to freedom of choice in the above. I’m just showcasing where it leads in the name of Truth and Love and ultimately Life (vs non-life).
Before we determine where we stand on issues that are up for social debate we should ask: Does this lead to life? Or does it lead to death? What if everyone decided to do it? Perhaps it leads to the death of the human race? Maybe that testifies of the spirit behind it.
CHOOSE LIFE. It is optional. And there’s still time.
Deuteronomy 30:15-20
John 14:6
https://youtu.be/obRG-2jurz0?feature=shared
There's no doubt that if they do try to pull off another Scamdemic, [DOD/DARPAbioengineeredweapon] Bird Flu will be their big bad boogeyman.
We will flight back!