31 Comments
User's avatar
Crixcyon's avatar

Not buying it. The government is explicitly responsible for millions of murders by mRNA poisons which by the way they are still massively pushing. Have they been banned? NO. Not even close.

I have had it with the more than common excuse of admitting no wrongdoing when that is EXACTLY what they did. Major murder and in my book that is wrongdoing to the hilt.

Same with a corporation that did harm and escapes with the same flimsy, putrid excuse. Never trusting the government or corporate America again.

If Trump, who started this whole mess had any real balls, he would admit he did wrong and we could get on with the prosecution and end of life procedures for all of these mass murderers.

And then pick up the millions who will have fainted from hearing the DC Swamp actually telling the truth for the first time in 100 years.

PatriciaHenry's avatar

He again doubled down on the amazingness of everything Warp Speed. “Everybody knows” it was amazing

Cheeps's avatar

Still waiting for this administration to demonstrate the appropriate leadership requisite to fully banish ALL vaccine-related discrimination—without the necessity of litigation—for every organ transplant patient and college students matriculating in health-care disciplines, where internships continue to demand compliance!

Trump played a decisive role in vaccine harms. He continues to boast the roll-out.

Egos have no place in sound governance. Donald Trump must shed his, if “America First” is to embody “We, the People” rather than “He, the Emperor”.

patrick.net/memes's avatar

Yes, exactly. Trump continues to boast about the horrifyingly deadly mRNA roll-out.

Worse, it was a massive violation of our Nuremberg rights on a global scale. ANY injection mandate is a violation of your human rights and of your body.

Crixcyon's avatar

Can't argue your point even though at one time I supported Trump.

Cheeps's avatar

Yes, I must also be numbered among those he angrily referenced in his Epstein post as “past” supporters, whose endorsement he no longer seeks. I supported him once, as well, until his MEgo became his obviously driving force, rather than the genuine good of the American people. No man is more dangerous than one who acknowledges no error. We have a naked emperor.

Medical Truth Podcast's avatar

Too Late Mr. Operation Warp Speed the damage is done!

Linda wallack's avatar

lets be sure to remember, it was biden crew than did the mandates. maybe that's why they blocked trump from getting that election (he would not have done mandates)

patrick.net/memes's avatar

True, but it's also true that Trump still has not admitted harm from the deadly mRNA jabs even now, with millions dead from them.

Nor has Trump banned the mRNA jabs.

That makes Trump guilty.

Linda wallack's avatar

i don't think ignorance can be made into intent. I actually know that most ppl walking this earth think vax/jabs are a godsend. Few of us know better. Now, maybe everyone you know, has always known vax are based in falsehood, but most ppl just gobble down any pharma, including jabs. So, maybe I'm wrong in my analysis, but I don't think so.

Cheeps's avatar

Ignorance would’ve apologized for the myriad harms, by now. Donald Trump is doing nothing of the sort. His “legacy” “vaccines” have now been proven deadly by a consensus of arduous study and real-life losses.

Since it strangely never touched his family despite their claimed vaccination, its tragedy is not his shared reality.

Linda wallack's avatar

not everyone I know has been injured by the jabs (but a few have). Now, I do suspect my mother (90years old), and has had every jab mankind has put forward, and yet, she is still here. Her mind is still very good, yet my brother died one month after the first booster. Now, he had some issues for sure, but what about my mother? granted, she never smoked and rarely drank booze, but she is on daily scripts and has been cut on (surgerys) numerous times (even cancer in one kidney). So this is a quandary, and I don't think I'm the only one that has this info in their brain-puter. I do think this might be an anomaly, but then again she had a good start in life (breastmilk and raised on a farm/sharecroppers). For trump, did it really not effect his family? I think of Ivana. For my mom...is it bc she is AB-neg and Rh- blood? Don't get me wrong, I do think she might be sick more often with strange stuff, but with her age, its really hard to tie the 2 together. We didn't find out (if true) about biden's turbo cancer, but as well, we may not know how often the trump fam has been jabbed (or if the jab was "hot"). Trump is pretty healthy for his diet, and being a germaphobe, he was on NO scripts or jabs until AFTER he got in the first time. and yes, i believe that record. But, I don't think trump has a lot of time to do the research some of us do in re health and pharma. I've been looking at this for decades.

Leo's avatar

"Most" people are not the president of the U.S. Being president carries a heavy demand for being/staying informed about all aspects of the nation.

Linda wallack's avatar

exactly....and what was he given by "the nation" departments? The snake really got inroads with obummercare. I can say that, bc that is when "govt" took the reins of "health care"...you know, that oh so wonderful socialistic crap that everyone deserves free HC that destroyed and continues to destroy real health care. Trump did not go after the office the first time with much talk about HC, did he? And when he was there to eff it up, none other than John McCAIN destroyed that attempt. It needed to go, and it did not....bc the people love their free jabs, quite frankly. that way, doing what's good for themselves just means getting pharma to make them feel better as they eat their way into an early grave. So, we see, even Kennedy is not having a very easy time. the president is not a savior or god, and this melting pot of a country just got blasted with the likes of the last homaland security guy LEADING in the locusts. peoples health should not be controlled by govt. some think it should be.

Linda wallack's avatar

See also above, for add'l response

Cheeps's avatar

Both administrations shared in the toxic debacle, as if choreographed. Biden’s press secretary even let slip that the Conservative vax hesitancy was nothing the dems had anticipated. No, they fully expected each party icon to bring along their respective bases.

I fear your assumptions about Trump may be misguided by his public personality, rather than his behind-the-scenes policy framework. Why has he made a former Big Pharma lobbyist his Chief of Staff/gatekeeper, to whom he unabashedly defers, even in press conferences?

He’s done NOTHING but facilitate Gates’s, Bancel’s, and Bourla’s forward press of biomedical insanity, bowing to big money in every arena. Why are unelected philanthropaths now insinuating their poison plots into our public food supply, gmo insect realms, and aerosolized biologicals, while his administration stands by silently? There’s no daylight between the perilous breadth and force of a mandate, and cross-cultural exposure that’s wholly unknowing and involuntary!

Linda wallack's avatar

see my response to other comment below. Ill add this for my double witness to what i said below, is Revelation 18:23, which means: by merchants and pharmakia (pharma products) were ALL nations "deceived". Its the manner in which the deception takes place, on whom (nations), and who the perps are (merchants and pharma). So, by observation, the written is secure and obvious.

Cheeps's avatar

Indeed, scripture lays out the coming evils, of that no question remains.

Nevertheless, like Judas, Trump receives no pass for being their vehicle.

Matthew 18:7:

Woe unto the world because of offenses! for it must needs be that offenses come; but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh!

As my double witness:

James 4:16-17:

But now ye rejoice in your boastings: all such rejoicing is evil. Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.

(KJV)

Linda wallack's avatar

no sin committed in ignorance is accounted sin.(ck that yourself) A good ex would be the first murderer, Cain murdering his brother....yet the law had not been given. There actually is not a law about personally choosing to take substances into the body......unless you want to consider pig/pork, etc. Maybe there is a law that says, one shall not take into body any substance made by man? (let me know) In a way, there is, but even with booze/wine, to not be gluttonous. Well, I do follow the health food laws. To me, I think the script I mentioned is actually accurate, and this happened FOR THE FIRST TIME, with nations being the "addition" (ie, not on a personal level, but en masse). Mandates, to me, is the same a rape. Also, it resembles how easy it will be for satan to hand out his mark in order to buy and sell (or eat) at the 6th trump, which is what biden crew did with the mandates. As well, most who take that mark have slumber......and will worship a/c-satan at the 6th trump. its just that easy, and slumber/stupor/ignorance will still be in play (which God put the millennium in place for) . And Judas seemed to have a lot of help with his hanging AND gutting......did he repent? I'm not sure which is worse: pig/non-scaled/finned fish or jabs (or GMO, or food/water additives/chemtrails/radiation/electromagnetic push). For James, lets continue to not take things out of context, and to not avoid the subject: Jas 4:17 kjv

Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.

You may think trump is not ignorant, but I think he is.

Cheeps's avatar

I have done sufficient research to know Trump was NOT ignorant as to the vaccine hazards. The vaccines were in use long before he claimed to have rolled them out with Operation Warp Speed, even contraindicated for human application in a roundly-cited study from as far back as 2012.

The inoculant was found, by a military litigator, listed in DMED records in 2017(the same year they were listed by proprietary name in foreign legislation).

With regard to scripture, NO holy text is “out of context”. The James verses are wholly applicable, as is Judas’s comparison. I seek to avoid no subject, while you seek to shield one of preference.

Once in a Laura Ingraham interview, Trump exclaimed that he felt he’d never done anything he needed to ask forgiveness for. Need I explore the Holy Bible with regard to that level of self-righeousness, or will you claim scriptural irrelevancy for that, as well?

Your understanding of scripture, while curiously liberal, absolves Trump of no wrongdoing—which he refuses to so much as admit!—NOW THAT SCIENCE ON THE KILLER SHOTS IS UNDENIABLE. Even IF you credit him with “ignorance” at the time, the hour for humble repentance and course correction is agonizingly overdue. Scripture nowhere creates carve-outs for acclaimed public figures. Jesus came to bear witness to TRUTH, not Trump’s “infallible”, ego-driven “always right”, plausible deniability. He cannot simultaneously be 4D chess master and duped by handlers. The buck stops with the president, be he sinister OR ignorant.

He’s had plenty of time to ruminate. His refusal to repent doesn’t point to ignorant.

Linda wallack's avatar

i feel the need to support my stmt about the Christian churches in re, and then you can check for yourself how many are aligned with the mentioned churches. This is what can cause ppl to leave the church or just throw out repentance. This is just a simple AI response to that question, there is variety, and they did not mention "armstongism" which had millions of believers. with the offshoots: there is significant disagreement among Christian denominations regarding whether sin after conversion invalidates salvation.

The Methodist, Wesleyan, Pentecostal, Church of Christ, and Roman Catholic traditions generally hold that a believer can lose salvation through persistent or willful sin after conversion.

The Wesleyan position, for example, teaches that while grace enables a person to choose salvation and live a sinless life, returning to a life of rebellion against God after conversion constitutes a rejection of salvation, rendering one ineligible for heaven.

This view is based on the belief that sin is a willful choice to rebel against God, and that continued rebellion after conversion demonstrates a rejection of God's grace.

Some interpretations of Hebrews 10–27 support this view, suggesting that willful sin after salvation leaves no further sacrifice for sins and results in judgment.

In contrast, other denominations such as Baptists, Presbyterians, and Reformed churches affirm the doctrine of eternal security, also known as "perseverance of the saints," which teaches that a true believer cannot lose salvation, regardless of subsequent sin.

According to this view, salvation is entirely God's work, and since God is faithful, those whom He saves will inevitably be brought to heaven.

Passages such as John 10–29 and Romans 8–39 are cited to support the belief that nothing can separate a believer from God's love or remove them from His hand.

Furthermore, 1 John 2 is interpreted to mean that those who ultimately fall away were never truly regenerate to begin with.

Thus, the belief that sin after conversion invalidates salvation is primarily held by Arminian-leaning traditions like Methodists and Pentecostals, while Calvinist and Reformed traditions reject this idea, maintaining that genuine salvation is eternally secure. repentance.

Linda wallack's avatar

re: trump not asking forgiveness. Do you realize how many "christian" churches actually think/teach "once saved always saved" and if they commit a sin after that, they are doomed? they teach that. (it comes from a misunderstand of John). So, they hide their sin or excuse it as "i've already been saved" (2 different things of course). There are millions that teach that. Anyway, I'm much further from liberal (I would follow God's recommendations for any breach of sin, BTW, and that is not liberal), but I am a realist and believe every single thing our Lord said which includes obeying civil law...from the beginning (since Genesis). As far as "absolving" Trump, that sounds like some catholic thing. The only forgiver of sins is our Lord, but that does not mean we are disallowed spiritual discernment...it's called Wisdom. If one thinks/knows they have sinned, it up to them as to whether they repent or not (what is that 7 times 70 a day), I have nothing to do with that. ck out what I said about the doctrine many churches teach---I

ll give you a clue...they also think man lying with man is "preference" born that way. Well, if we did what our Father says to do on the matter, this would be removed from among you. Yet, it WILL BE like sod/gor at the end....so, it ain't goin away. and trump as not all that conservative, that's for sure. "the buck stops w/president"? does that include the braindead biden run by a bunch of kenites? can we really say biden "done it". oh....you probably don't know the kenite anyway. 1st time in history, that we had kenites 100% running the office of president. And trump, is of real Judah (scott/germanic). and of course, Judah got his a$$ handed to him by "the king of Babylon", didn't he. as far as Rev 18:23, I would consider an alternate explanation as to what you think that will or does mean. And, this is the first time I've been called "liberal".....not sure why that is. and don't forget, it was Kushner that blocked info from Trump by certain doctors. Oh, and I have consider intent on all this (with motives, the who, the timing etc). But when I can see the scripture involved, it makes thinks much clearer.....so please give your analysis of Rev 18:23 so I can take a look at it.

Bard Joseph's avatar

Data already in the hands of Musk's DOGE.

Data is privatized for real ID?

patrick.net/memes's avatar

This is good, but not nearly good enough. Everyone who imposed dangerous and defective mRNA mandates must be tried and hanged:

https://patrick.net/post/1377537/2022-11-03-everyone-who-imposed-mrna-injections

The jab mandates were the worst crime against humanity ever, causing at least 17 million deaths so far, including my wife's co-worker Danielle:

https://patrick.net/post/1340336/2021-07-29-thread-for-vax-deaths-maimings-and?start=8886#comment-2196928

Juniorwheelhoss's avatar

Nope, this is THE ONLY ISSUE that really matters to the many millions of Americans murdered and injured by this filth.

The longer you wait, Mr. President, the more you align yourself with those who deserve public hangings.

There will only be continually declining faith in the corrupt “medical” system until this is resolved with state trials.

People will increasingly approach any kind of medical interaction as likely predatory and murderous (a rational conclusion) responding increasingly in kind, with violence, resulting in the need for constant, armed security at medical offices and hospitals, entirely locked down hospitals and ER’s, and an entire army just to ensure the safe travel of nurses, docs and other necessary staff.

I sure hope this doesn’t happen but reasonable people will only tolerate assaults on their lives for so long until they don’t anymore.

If you’ve watched your loved ones die or be poisoned and no reckoning is imminent, eventually your patience expires.

FreedomFighter's avatar

Better than nothing? In my opinion, not by much. Without an admission of wrongdoing or guilt, without an appropriate punishment, there is no justice. Where in this is the disincentive to the government not to behave immorally, unethically and illegally? How does this stop the government from acting unconstitutionally again? This is less than a slap on the wrist.

The government has once again proven that it is in control. Where is the government of, by and for the people? We, the people, matter not.

PatriciaHenry's avatar

The DOJ’s agreement includes a 60-day deadline for the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to issue a directive ordering all federal agencies to destroy records related to COVID-19 vaccine status, mandate non-compliance, or exemption requests—unless an individual employee chooses to opt out.

Federal workers who don’t opt out but later wish to have their records expunged will be able to request removal at any time.

Well that sounds weird. Have to read to court docs I guess but without any citation of wrongdoing then they’re free to do it again

damon mcclure's avatar

Similar was done is Australia where the government directed businesses to destroy record's.

I believe this isn't just what it seems at face value but to hide the intergenerational taint they've introduced to the peasantry bloodlines.

Within a decade we won't know who's transfected let alone 3 generations. But they seem to have an endless facination with breeding and bloodlines so I suspect they'll ensure this alteration skips themselves and their children

Fred's avatar

Whilst at it, purge "Gain of Function" virus BS!.

Zana Carver, Ph.D.'s avatar

It's a step in the right direction.