10 Comments
User's avatar
Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

None of the PCR methods to identify “cases” make any sense. Finding genetic material outside the body in snot, spit, or poop means nothing. That’s where potential pathogens get stuck and eliminated before they get through epithelial barriers, so many positive tests are in subjects who are not infected and may never be. Trying to tie the positive finding on the outside of the body with the serum antibodies found inside the body also means nothing. Measurable serum antibody titers mean the subject was exposed at some point, with no way to tell if the infection is active unless there are symptoms… but even that is not accurate as many active infections are asymptomatic. Really, the only way to identify cases is to find the actual complete genetic material inside the body, not outside, and not the reactive antibodies.

We must return to biological reality. A true “case” must demonstrate pathogen replication INSIDE the body, with concurrent biochemical markers like cytokines that indicate something active is happening. Unfortunately, this is not done because it’s inconvenient, expensive, and dangerous to the narrative.

Mark's avatar

Despite this excellent study, the vast majority will subject themselves to their next PCR test with the same psychotic sense of duty to authority as they did their last one.

And in the unlikely event that they test negative, they'll go back the next day for another test...

Zana Carver, Ph.D.'s avatar

They used the same sneaky tactics to push the lie of asymptomatic transmission of Covid-19, with high PCR cycle counts and no confirmation of asymptomatic transmission.

Brian  Klunder's avatar

In other words... They haven't made a PCR test that can detect the man-made bioengineered virus

they created, so they have to make up another lie for their digital AI slave race they are creating!

Silver up 163% this year = AI slave race full steam ahead!

Thank you, Jon.

Fred's avatar

Will be interesting to see how many of the Jab Test Dummies will run out and line up for this one....

The Green Hornet's avatar

What a grift.

PCR grift.

At least one call out.

Just hope most aren’t brainwashed or fearporned into this shite again.

Crixcyon's avatar

PCR is a measure of electrical variances. Exactly what are the standards for PCR? They are all over the map. No pre-vetting or trials to determine the standards and efficacy of PCR. And for sure, DNA/RNA cannot be assumed to be part of any solid science or that of genetics. It is all manufactured by computer algorithms and interfacing. The blanks are filled by guesses.

Tinfoiler's avatar

You say "PCR-positive test results are *NOT* being used to justify bird flu containment measures around the world." Did you mean "NOW"?

RAY MCMULLEN's avatar

According to Dr Cary Mullis his PCR test cannot tell anyone if anyone is infected with anything so that number should be zero. Biggest scientific fraud in history.

Bobby's avatar

They are pushing Covid again, positive test being done heard about at least 5 already. Sadly fear is setting in again.