25 Comments
User's avatar
Kathleen Taylor's avatar

There are no state borders in the air.

James Nichols's avatar

Horray For Iowa. Way To Go Senate Panel. I Hope Many More States Follow Suit.

They Have Screwed Up Our Weather Systems For The Past 2 Decades.

This Is Why We Had The Worst Cold Front Ever In Modern Times This Past Weekend.

Wake UP Everyone To What’s Really Going On!

Crixcyon's avatar

Since this poisoning using chemtrails covers every state, wouldn't a national law be more effective? Since none have been considered (to my knowledge), I must assume that once again congress doesn't give an F-ing F**k. Weather modification my butt.

Brian  Klunder's avatar

Thank you, Jon!

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

A few months ago, I read that the legislation in Florida and (Tennessee I think) did not go through, because this has to be decided nationally. Last year here in GA it seemed there was a lot less chemtrail, but lately I see it again. 2 weeks ago, several days in a row. As another stacker mentioned, it is useless to contact congressmen or other legislature, because what you get is a standard letter and nothing gets done.

Michele Linehan's avatar

Ingrid, same in AR. My Senators send form letters back on everything. They are useless! One of my local reps actually said he'd never heard of Chemtrails. I guess he never looks up.

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

could be blind, too! I had to really laugh out loud at that! I have given up on politics altogether. One heap of useless eaters.

FreedomFighter's avatar

I know it seems to be wasted energy to contact our reps (state-wide, federal and even local) in regards to geo-engineering, but it is really the only we can let the perpetrators know that we are aware and displeased.

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

They don't get to see our letters or emails, I think. An employee sends a standardized response and deletes our writing, is what I think.

FreedomFighter's avatar

Ingrid, you may be right. I have received form letters, no further replies.

Any suggestions?

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

If possible, meet them in person. Some do town hall meetings. So far I only have heard from one who made it to our small town. And even then it might be hard to be heard. I also subscribed to the phone meeting for a while, but you only heard a few, and sometimes the same question was put multiple times, and not what you wanted to hear. so, not not really. they still vote their own way, or the party way, for most.

Danyèle's avatar

Most of the weather modifications are done by the militaries, contractors, and private corporations.

According to Dane, from GeoengineeringWatch, the poisoning is done at huge scale with multiple harmful chemicals and metals that aim at reducing solar intensity and cool the planet, THEIR climate change scam.

Plainly, they pollute the air we breathe, soils where we grow our food, and the waters without our consent. This is intended war against Humanity.

Connie Lemmincakes's avatar

Wanna know why the luggage requirements changed? So there was more room for geoengineering/weather modification paraphernalia in the planes.

DrGU's avatar

These worthless spineless laws either die in committee after passing one legislative chamber or if passed, are emasculated with politican's double talk. E.G. the deliberate use of the word "deliberate"

Look at the GA law that passed the House, died in the Senate. Totally worthless. No provision for either enforcement or even detection. Nothing but a sop to Republican voters in a state that is nominally Republican but run by Rhinos and Democrats.

Nothing can happen here until the public gets transparent reporting of all the activities of the government, gov. contractors, and NGOs/PPP/big corporate activities.

Do a good investigative report of all the geochemical patents granted and who are the owners...

Darla Smith's avatar

The thing is these states are not saying, is they only have control of the first 3,000 miles of air space above our cities and states. So, they can NOT control the air space above that. Their bills are just theater. They all know this...

Jean's avatar

This is not going to work, in the states that have already passed laws to stop the spraying have been given orders from the FAA to stop pursuing this subject. It is NOT coming from airliners, it is Military planes and DARPA. Because the people will not stand up against this, America is Done.

Robert Loerch's avatar

Hopefully other States will follow suit 🙏🏻

Doreene Close's avatar

getting around these laws by changing the jet fuel formula must not stand!

Josie's avatar

All this chem trails and weather modification needs to be stopped now! They, the evil ones have killed so many people, I think intentional with weather modification! Trying to kill as many of us as possible! Darpa and anyone one involved needs to be removed anyway possible, ASAP! This should be number one on the list that our unqualified government officials need to address! Pure Evil

Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

Those white stripes in the sky will never completely go away no matter how many governmental restrictions are imposed. However, there are four ways to reduce their visibility.

1: Allow international passenger jet travel but restrict domestic travel to high-speed rail. Europe and parts of Asia already demonstrate this effect on short-haul routes. In the U.S., the lack of corridor-scale high-speed rail makes this structurally infeasible in the near term… unless you want to lock everyone into the 15-minute smart cities proposed by the WEF, UN-Habitat, C40 cities, and the “philanthropists” behind them. So, be careful what you wish for.

2: Eliminate sulfur from commercial jet fuel as it was from diesel fuel and military jet fuel (JP-8 and JP-5). Sulfur is not added to jet fuel; it is naturally present and has lubrication properties necessary for jet engines to operate. Removing sulfur from military jet fuel reduced the thermal signature and visible contrails for stealth reasons. So, the military had to add other compounds for lubrication, explaining why commercial jets cannot use military fuel. Removing sulfur reduces formation of sulfate aerosols, slightly reduces the number and size of ice nuclei, and can shorten contrail lifetime when conditions are right. This will not prevent contrails entirely. Jets that fly through ISSRs (ice supersaturated regions) will always leave persistent contrails regardless of what is in the engine exhaust.

3: Restrict passenger jets to fly only at altitudes that will not leave persistent visible trails. This is the most immediately feasible way, and it’s already being tested by several airlines (Lufthansa Group, Air France-KLM, American Airlines, and Japan Airlines). They have proven ISSRs can easily be avoided by changing the cruising altitude by a few thousand feet. The downside is increased fuel burning, a cost that passengers would see in ticket prices if contrail avoidance were mandated.

4: Switch to 100% SAFs (Sustainable Aviation Fuels). These fuels have no sulfur, have natural lubricity, and create less soot after combustion, therefore less nuclei for visible contrails to form. No modifications to jet engines are necessary, and some airlines are already using SAF blends to prove feasibility. However, switching to 100% SAFs would increase ticket prices and may have significant environmental impacts to produce the billions of gallons per year that would be necessary.

Joyce's avatar

This is at least a good start.