Nature's 'Scientific Reports' study confirms the technology doesn’t exist, the materials don’t exist, and the risks can’t be contained—making “sun-blocking” schemes both impossible and dangerous.
The only way to ever stop this shit is to make collective lawsuits against the airlines and their pilots who are using modified jet fuel laced with metals to create toxic contrail cirrus. Until this happens, NOTHING changes!
What modified jet fuel are you referring to? There are very tight tolerances on ANY metal contaminants in jet fuel. Jet engine manufacturers warranty billions of dollars’ worth of their products to airlines, and one of the first things they look for after any problems with engines is fuel contamination that voids their warranty. As Jon stated in his investigation, passenger jet contrails are accidental geoengineering, totally random, not controlled. Passenger jets can be restricted to altitudes that will either leave a contrail or not, but airlines will NEVER go for that unless the government (you the taxpayer) subsidize them will billions of dollars to cover the cost of fuel burn to do that. https://drkevinstillwagon.substack.com/p/look-up-in-the-sky
You will see that the airline industry PURPOSEFULLY uses airline fleets to create contrail cirrus clouds (which persist for very long periods) in order to "block out the sun" for the desired "cooling" effect (their words, not mine). In my section, I point to their own studies and reports to this effect, showing their own slides and link to their reports. Here are some you can take the time to carefully read:
1) The 2010 ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change which took place in Montreal (Canada) in May of 2010.
2) "Lee then cited noteworthy comments made by the world’s leading expert on ‘Contrail Physics’, Dr. Ulrich Shumann of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics from Germany’s DLR Aerospace Center."
have a look at this slide which substantiates my assertion that they want the cooling effect via "cooling contrails":
3) And MOST TELLINGLY: you should examine the work of the Royal Aeronautical Society (RaeS, based in London). Specifically, read their briefing paper by the Royal Aeronautical Society – CONTRAILS AND CONTRAIL MANAGEMENT, Greener by Design Specialist Group from April 2023 also attests to the contrail management techniques.
This paper also confirms that jet exhaust contains soot (black carbon) and helps to explain what is technically referred to as “persistent contrails.” In section 2. FORMATION OF CONTRAILS AND CONTRAIL-INDUCED CIRRUS CLOUD, they state [with emphasis added]:
“if the aircraft is flying through a region of air that is supersaturated with respect to ice (ISSR – ice supersaturated region), the contrail will not only contain ice from the exhaust water vapour, but also water vapour from the surrounding atmosphere. In this case, a ‘persistent’ contrail forms, with its characteristic very long twin parallel white lines, caused by the ice crystals being trapped in the aircraft’s trailing vortex system. Persistent contrails can be hundreds of kilometres long, with a lifetime of several hours. As the contrail ages, it may develop into contrail cirrus, the twin parallel lines disappear, but lenticular cloud or clouds remain.”
This passage helps us lay folk to understand and confirm two things:
That cirrus clouds are indeed the result of the aircraft-produced contrails;
they persist, i.e., last a long time (several hours), and can stretch over long distances (hundreds of kilometres).
And here is the MOST TELLING PART OF THEIR PAPER which I noted:
But what I find particularly noteworthy and telling of this, more recent, briefing paper is that it appears to admit that contrails and contrail-induced cirrus clouds from aircraft have a greater net warming effect than their CO2 emissions.
And page 3 of their report states the following - VERY TELLING - part:
"The current overall effect of contrails and contrail cirrus is a net warming - about 1.5 times that of aviation's CO2"
LET ME REPEAT THAT:
The produced EFFECT of their (collective airline industry) operation of producing contrail cirrus clouds has a ****NET WARMING**** effect of ALL OF THAT AVIATION INDUSTRY's produced CO2.
Here is the screenshot of that quote from p. 3 of their report.
I flew Boeing 727s, DC9s, DC10s, and Airbuses from 1987 through 2020 and have looked at contrails up close and personal. The formation of contrails is mostly determined by atmospheric humidity & temperature, not fuel alone. Even with zero-soot fuel, engine design still emits some nuclei (metal oxides, residual particles) that allow contrails to form.
High altitude contrails will turn into cirrus clouds, and it’s always been that way. This will either block solar radiation from reaching the ground or trap it from escaping depending on the time of day or night they form. This is not being done intentionally by airline pilots. We fly at altitudes that give us the best ride, most favorable winds, and fuel burn savings… regardless of whether we leave a contrail or not. As I explained, aircraft can be restricted to altitudes to either make contrails or not, however this is not being done, and probably won’t be done in my opinion.
The metals you mention do exist in jet contrails in trace amounts verified by airborne laboratories, and they are more concentrated in the soil around airports. They exist in jet fuel as byproducts of the refining process, and some are additives for lubricating and antioxidants. As I mentioned, their concentrations are strictly controlled and monitored, and they are not added to biofuels. The metals geoengineering scientists are most interested in are ones that block solar radiation whether or not they form contrails or clouds. Those are the ones they talk about injecting into the stratosphere where most passenger jets don’t go.
Obviously there have been environmental impacts of passenger jets leaving contrails that turn into clouds and block the sun. It is estimated that worldwide, passenger jets emit about 2 to 3 million tons of solar radiation blocking sulfate aerosols into the troposphere that typically wash out in a few days. This pales in comparison to normal volcanic eruptions that occur, averaging ten times that amount every year, reaching the stratosphere and can last for up to 3 years. That’s why idiots like Bill Gates want to do Stratospheric Aerosol Injections, not Tropospheric Aerosol Injections.
The left wants to make everything solar powered but then at the same time they want to block the sun. Are they stupid or what!? Oh wait, I forgot... They're stupid AND evil!!!
The climate has not been warming. That’s been proven to be a result of poor controls over the weather stations. Rural ones closed or had suburban zones built around them. Either way their recorded temperatures would rise. Space based temperature observation has shown zero warming in recent decades. Combine that with intentional manipulation of the temperature records and you get a faux warming rate.
A few years ago I had bet a coworker about the low temps we observe in the Dallas area. I said more than half of the years in recent history (since the 80s) we had experienced at least one day of single digit lows. I went through the temperature records and I was right. A few years later I had cause to go back and look again and the records were altered. They had removed the spike of low temps. What a sneaky way to show a temperature increase. The truth in Dallas is that the weather has grown much milder. Not as hot nor as cold as it used to be. Not as many severe storms either. The weather has just gotten so much better and no one has even told us that. They keep saying it’s getting worse and worse. Smh
I have noticed the same here in Ireland. They told us that June was the warmest on record when actually it was the coldest and there were many days they told us it was in the mid twenties and there was no way on earth it was anywhere near that.
In fact it was really bizarre the sun would be shining but the air was freezing - in the summer and so I would say it was the coldest summer on record.
So with no rise in temperature, why the need to block the sun?? And in doing so crops will fail and we will starve. And a total block out will only take weeks to kill all living things on Earth as everything will freeze but we could survive underground with the right setup.
Back in 2022, bill gates of hell went before Congress to ask permission to do something he had already been doing. I guess he figured forgiveness is easier to obtain than permission. Congress decided that it could be catastrophic to do such spraying not knowing what the long-term consequences might be. They told gates and bezos “Do not spray anything to block out the sun!!” You may ask what is the reason they would want to do such a thing. You must consider that vampires hate the sun and would love for it to exist no more.
It’s easy to see that they have already been doing this just by looking up on clear days or moonlit nights. There is a haze that not only changes the blue skies to a dull, hazy whitish blue in the daytime and makes the moon seem blurry at night.
There is a Canadian man who has his eighty year old friend’s affidavit. His friend used to work on the nozzle technology for these weather Modification operations, back during the Vietnam war.
He spoke up about this on a call with Reinette on a save our skies meeting. I’m wondering why she hasn’t shared the affidavit, yet. The man was targeted and injured, so he was unable to testify in Canada.
Maybe you could ask her about this, as she asked him for a copy of the affidavit.
Again, we need strong whistleblower protection so these people can come forward.
Anyhow, I just paid my energy bill. Said this past month was -1 degree (cooler) than this month last year. Which is usually the case in any given month.
This is a great video of Dane Wigington testifying in front of the Wyoming Legislature about Geo-Engineering and why is hasn't been stopped and how and who is spraying our skies. I was surprised to see the Senators had some good questions to be answered.
Why don't we call it what it is: Experimental DOD program to use as a weapon of war.
Sociopath have changed the West from high trust societies into low trust societies
They gaslight everyone and lie just to spite truth
These are idiots supporting an agenda, not any real science.
The only way to ever stop this shit is to make collective lawsuits against the airlines and their pilots who are using modified jet fuel laced with metals to create toxic contrail cirrus. Until this happens, NOTHING changes!
https://fournier.substack.com/i/143852576/is-there-intent
What modified jet fuel are you referring to? There are very tight tolerances on ANY metal contaminants in jet fuel. Jet engine manufacturers warranty billions of dollars’ worth of their products to airlines, and one of the first things they look for after any problems with engines is fuel contamination that voids their warranty. As Jon stated in his investigation, passenger jet contrails are accidental geoengineering, totally random, not controlled. Passenger jets can be restricted to altitudes that will either leave a contrail or not, but airlines will NEVER go for that unless the government (you the taxpayer) subsidize them will billions of dollars to cover the cost of fuel burn to do that. https://drkevinstillwagon.substack.com/p/look-up-in-the-sky
Thanks for weighing in Dr. Stillwagon.
But, respectfully, you seem to be mis- of ill-informed. Firstly, they add these to the so-called "biofuels" - you can research this on the net.
When you say "passenger jet contrails are accidental geoengineering, totally random, not controlled" this is absolutely incorrect.
Just read the entire section I pointed to in Part 4 of my series (see full section 4.2.2., URL: https://fournier.substack.com/i/143852576/technically-speaking-with-jim-lee).
You will see that the airline industry PURPOSEFULLY uses airline fleets to create contrail cirrus clouds (which persist for very long periods) in order to "block out the sun" for the desired "cooling" effect (their words, not mine). In my section, I point to their own studies and reports to this effect, showing their own slides and link to their reports. Here are some you can take the time to carefully read:
1) The 2010 ICAO Colloquium on Aviation and Climate Change which took place in Montreal (Canada) in May of 2010.
https://www2023.icao.int/Meetings/EnvironmentalColloquium/Pages/2010-Colloquium.aspx
archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20250715215836/https://www.icao.int/Meetings/EnvironmentalColloquium/Pages/2010-Colloquium.aspx
2) "Lee then cited noteworthy comments made by the world’s leading expert on ‘Contrail Physics’, Dr. Ulrich Shumann of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics from Germany’s DLR Aerospace Center."
have a look at this slide which substantiates my assertion that they want the cooling effect via "cooling contrails":
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!IqbQ!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F54e46997-fe1e-4a66-aad6-065f5f4051b0_1449x1058.png
see also this one:
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!cIc_!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc2114491-15c4-4ea5-84f0-66fe96e9b1a7_1126x422.png
3) And MOST TELLINGLY: you should examine the work of the Royal Aeronautical Society (RaeS, based in London). Specifically, read their briefing paper by the Royal Aeronautical Society – CONTRAILS AND CONTRAIL MANAGEMENT, Greener by Design Specialist Group from April 2023 also attests to the contrail management techniques.
URL of the paper (in PDF): https://www.aerosociety.com/media/20657/contrails-and-contrail-management-briefing-paper.pdf
From my article notes:
This paper also confirms that jet exhaust contains soot (black carbon) and helps to explain what is technically referred to as “persistent contrails.” In section 2. FORMATION OF CONTRAILS AND CONTRAIL-INDUCED CIRRUS CLOUD, they state [with emphasis added]:
“if the aircraft is flying through a region of air that is supersaturated with respect to ice (ISSR – ice supersaturated region), the contrail will not only contain ice from the exhaust water vapour, but also water vapour from the surrounding atmosphere. In this case, a ‘persistent’ contrail forms, with its characteristic very long twin parallel white lines, caused by the ice crystals being trapped in the aircraft’s trailing vortex system. Persistent contrails can be hundreds of kilometres long, with a lifetime of several hours. As the contrail ages, it may develop into contrail cirrus, the twin parallel lines disappear, but lenticular cloud or clouds remain.”
This passage helps us lay folk to understand and confirm two things:
That cirrus clouds are indeed the result of the aircraft-produced contrails;
they persist, i.e., last a long time (several hours), and can stretch over long distances (hundreds of kilometres).
And here is the MOST TELLING PART OF THEIR PAPER which I noted:
But what I find particularly noteworthy and telling of this, more recent, briefing paper is that it appears to admit that contrails and contrail-induced cirrus clouds from aircraft have a greater net warming effect than their CO2 emissions.
And page 3 of their report states the following - VERY TELLING - part:
"The current overall effect of contrails and contrail cirrus is a net warming - about 1.5 times that of aviation's CO2"
LET ME REPEAT THAT:
The produced EFFECT of their (collective airline industry) operation of producing contrail cirrus clouds has a ****NET WARMING**** effect of ALL OF THAT AVIATION INDUSTRY's produced CO2.
Here is the screenshot of that quote from p. 3 of their report.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!eUO9!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd776dc38-2026-4077-b228-746f5071361a_307x294.png
So, please have an objective look at these materials which I hope will change your perspective on things.
Thanks again for weighing in.
Respectfully,
There are no metals added to the biofuels, called SAFs or Sustainable Aviation Fuels. Biofuels reduce the impact of nucleation that results in contrail formation. Biofuels reduce soot and sulfur ultimately resulting in fewer, shorter, and thinner contrails. You can verify that here: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230003527/downloads/20230314_ARMD_AviationContrails_forDistr.pdf
I flew Boeing 727s, DC9s, DC10s, and Airbuses from 1987 through 2020 and have looked at contrails up close and personal. The formation of contrails is mostly determined by atmospheric humidity & temperature, not fuel alone. Even with zero-soot fuel, engine design still emits some nuclei (metal oxides, residual particles) that allow contrails to form.
High altitude contrails will turn into cirrus clouds, and it’s always been that way. This will either block solar radiation from reaching the ground or trap it from escaping depending on the time of day or night they form. This is not being done intentionally by airline pilots. We fly at altitudes that give us the best ride, most favorable winds, and fuel burn savings… regardless of whether we leave a contrail or not. As I explained, aircraft can be restricted to altitudes to either make contrails or not, however this is not being done, and probably won’t be done in my opinion.
The metals you mention do exist in jet contrails in trace amounts verified by airborne laboratories, and they are more concentrated in the soil around airports. They exist in jet fuel as byproducts of the refining process, and some are additives for lubricating and antioxidants. As I mentioned, their concentrations are strictly controlled and monitored, and they are not added to biofuels. The metals geoengineering scientists are most interested in are ones that block solar radiation whether or not they form contrails or clouds. Those are the ones they talk about injecting into the stratosphere where most passenger jets don’t go.
Obviously there have been environmental impacts of passenger jets leaving contrails that turn into clouds and block the sun. It is estimated that worldwide, passenger jets emit about 2 to 3 million tons of solar radiation blocking sulfate aerosols into the troposphere that typically wash out in a few days. This pales in comparison to normal volcanic eruptions that occur, averaging ten times that amount every year, reaching the stratosphere and can last for up to 3 years. That’s why idiots like Bill Gates want to do Stratospheric Aerosol Injections, not Tropospheric Aerosol Injections.
The left wants to make everything solar powered but then at the same time they want to block the sun. Are they stupid or what!? Oh wait, I forgot... They're stupid AND evil!!!
An obvious crime. I reference Jon's work and offer a revolutionary alternative for the big picture: https://oldschoolcounselor.substack.com/p/how-can-anyone-go-on-living-as-ifure:
The climate has not been warming. That’s been proven to be a result of poor controls over the weather stations. Rural ones closed or had suburban zones built around them. Either way their recorded temperatures would rise. Space based temperature observation has shown zero warming in recent decades. Combine that with intentional manipulation of the temperature records and you get a faux warming rate.
A few years ago I had bet a coworker about the low temps we observe in the Dallas area. I said more than half of the years in recent history (since the 80s) we had experienced at least one day of single digit lows. I went through the temperature records and I was right. A few years later I had cause to go back and look again and the records were altered. They had removed the spike of low temps. What a sneaky way to show a temperature increase. The truth in Dallas is that the weather has grown much milder. Not as hot nor as cold as it used to be. Not as many severe storms either. The weather has just gotten so much better and no one has even told us that. They keep saying it’s getting worse and worse. Smh
I have noticed the same here in Ireland. They told us that June was the warmest on record when actually it was the coldest and there were many days they told us it was in the mid twenties and there was no way on earth it was anywhere near that.
In fact it was really bizarre the sun would be shining but the air was freezing - in the summer and so I would say it was the coldest summer on record.
So with no rise in temperature, why the need to block the sun?? And in doing so crops will fail and we will starve. And a total block out will only take weeks to kill all living things on Earth as everything will freeze but we could survive underground with the right setup.
Now wait a minute .....
Geoengineering, just like global warming, is a dangerous scam. Great article Jon!
Back in 2022, bill gates of hell went before Congress to ask permission to do something he had already been doing. I guess he figured forgiveness is easier to obtain than permission. Congress decided that it could be catastrophic to do such spraying not knowing what the long-term consequences might be. They told gates and bezos “Do not spray anything to block out the sun!!” You may ask what is the reason they would want to do such a thing. You must consider that vampires hate the sun and would love for it to exist no more.
It’s easy to see that they have already been doing this just by looking up on clear days or moonlit nights. There is a haze that not only changes the blue skies to a dull, hazy whitish blue in the daytime and makes the moon seem blurry at night.
There is a Canadian man who has his eighty year old friend’s affidavit. His friend used to work on the nozzle technology for these weather Modification operations, back during the Vietnam war.
He spoke up about this on a call with Reinette on a save our skies meeting. I’m wondering why she hasn’t shared the affidavit, yet. The man was targeted and injured, so he was unable to testify in Canada.
Maybe you could ask her about this, as she asked him for a copy of the affidavit.
Again, we need strong whistleblower protection so these people can come forward.
And yet; they’re doing it, every day, poisoning us all…
Tell Bill Gates the BioTerrorist and sociopath.
If that’s not an indictment of geoengineering then I don’t know what is.
"Low risk"? Yeah - they don't care about that.
Anyhow, I just paid my energy bill. Said this past month was -1 degree (cooler) than this month last year. Which is usually the case in any given month.
To cool the planet, plant trees.
To sequester carbon, plant trees.
To increase rain fall, stop slash and burn deforestation in Brazil.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/02/climate/amazon-brazil-drought-rain-deforestation.html
This is a great video of Dane Wigington testifying in front of the Wyoming Legislature about Geo-Engineering and why is hasn't been stopped and how and who is spraying our skies. I was surprised to see the Senators had some good questions to be answered.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UStlQZMJQ2A