Dr. Fauci Testifies '6 Feet Apart' Social Distancing Rule 'Just appeared': 'Likely Not Based On Any Data'

Fauci was interviewed by the U.S. House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

In a revealing two-day transcribed interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci, Chairman Brad Wenstrup of the U.S. House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic raised serious concerns about the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and the public health authority’s decision-making process.

A Wednesday press release highlights several key points from Dr. Fauci’s testimony, shedding light on potential systemic failures in the public health system.

One striking revelation from the testimony is Dr. Fauci’s admission that the widely promoted “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation may not have been based on scientific data.

According to Wenstrup's statement, Dr. Fauci characterized the development of the guidance by saying, “it sort of just appeared.”

The rule, which was promoted by federal health officials, “was likely not based on any data,” according to the press release.

This raises questions about the scientific basis for some of the measures implemented during the pandemic.

Read the press release below:

Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) issued the following statement after the second day of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s transcribed interview:

“After two days of testimony and 14 hours of questioning, many things became evident. During his interview today, Dr. Fauci claimed that the policies and mandates he promoted may unfortunately increase vaccine hesitancy for years to come. He testified that the lab leak hypothesis — which was often suppressed — was, in fact, not a conspiracy theory. Further, the social distancing recommendations forced on Americans ‘sort of just appeared’ and were likely not based on scientific data.

“Dr. Fauci’s transcribed interview revealed systemic failures in our public health system and shed light on serious procedural concerns with our public health authority. It is clear that dissenting opinions were often not considered or suppressed completely. Should a future pandemic arise, America’s response must be guided by scientific facts and conclusive data.

“While we remain frustrated with Dr. Fauci’s inability to recollect COVID-19 information that is important for our investigation, others we have spoken to do recall the facts. I appreciate Dr. Fauci’s willingness to testify privately in front of the Select Subcommittee and look forward to speaking with him further at a public hearing this year. There are many opportunities to do better in the future.”

Key takeaways from day two of Dr. Fauci’s transcribed interview:

• Dr. Fauci claimed that the “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation promoted by federal health officials was likely not based on any data. He characterized the development of the guidance by stating “it sort of just appeared.”

• Dr. Fauci acknowledged that the lab leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory. This comes nearly four years after prompting the publication of the now infamous “Proximal Origin” paper that attempted to vilify and disprove the lab leak hypothesis.

• Dr. Fauci admitted that America’s vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic could increase vaccine hesitancy in the future. Previously, Dr. Fauci advocated “that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated.”

• When American universities approached Dr. Fauci, he advised them to impose vaccine mandates on their students.

• Dr. Fauci denies allegations that he visited the CIA during the pandemic or influenced the CIA’s investigation into the origins of COVID-19.

• Dr. Fauci played semantics with the definition of a “lab-leak” in an attempt to cover-up the inaccurate conclusions of “Proximal Origin.” It is impossible for Dr. Fauci to defend the conclusion of this publication while simultaneously acknowledging that a lab-leak is possible.