Of course!!! That’s because outwardly diverse life forms share in common significant portions of their genome. For example, Google search key words “earthworm” “human” “genome” gives this:
“While not direct relatives, humans share surprisingly deep genetic roots with worms, particularly with ancient marine acorn worms, with about 70% of human genes tracing back to a common ancestor from over 500 million years ago, revealing shared machinery for development, like gill slits in embryos.”
and this:
“Comparing their genomes to ours shows about 70% of human genes (around 14,000) have counterparts from a common ancestor that lived during the Cambrian explosion.”
….
The PCR test is completely useless because it’s essentially impossible to prove that the genomic sequence that one is amplifying is precisely unique to, say, a corona virus. It’s the “black swan” conundrum of induction. It’s akin to trying to specifically identify an exact song by identifying a short sequence of notes that are contained in the song without knowing if that same sequence of notes is contained in some other song. The media gave some coverage of the so-called “cycle” problem where false positives were obtained because the amplification was so high that it was basically turning background noise into signal. That was all true, but that was actually the lesser of the two problems—the quantitative problem—and it misled people into thinking that if you just kept the cycle count down to a reasonable amount then you’d necessarily have an accurate result. Wrong! The greatest flaw with PCR (as a tool for diagnosing disease) is not quantitative; it’s QUALITATIVE. But the qualitative shortcoming is a little bit more complicated to explain and, frankly, it’s not really something that can be corrected like you could correct the likelihood of a quantitative false positive by simply lowering the cycle threshold. So, since the qualitative flaw is a fatal flaw, it was quietly swept under the rug in the interest of preserving the narrative. Of course, I haven’t even mentioned the fact that even if the target genome was uniquely peculiar to the corona virus and even if the concentration of that virus was accurately determined in either mucus or blood serum, that is far, far removed from any cause and effect relationship that could be made to actual disease or symptoms of disease. To name just one flaw in the logic, genome fragments are just that: fragments. Just because you detect fragments, even if the fragments are unique to a given pathogen, doesn’t mean that the fragments were part of a viable protein and that the protein was in turn part of a viable pathogen that relies on the proper functioning of all the other proteins, etc. that makes a pathogen pathogenic. Incidentally, the antigen tests that largely replaced PCR are similarly flawed, but let’s try and wrap our heads around one psyop at a time.
Excellent points. Among them- excess cycles of amplification increase the chances of a false "positive", but no reduction in cycles fixes the underlying flaw in the use of the PCR technique as a diagnostic test.
Except... the use of Go Ogle*. DuckDuckGo or better yet, get Brave to search the internet.
*The honest way to spell the corporate name.
'Go Ogle Is a Surveillance Organization. Here's How to de-Go Ogle Your Life'
Thanks for the tip and article reference. I actually do use DuckDuckGo but I do have a bad habit of using the word “Google” as a proprietary eponym. It’s a bad habit because it reinforces a false association in the mind of the unsuspecting reader.
Corporations love it when we use their brand names as a general term for a type of product, and train us to do so quite effectively.
Your explanation of the 'fatal flaw' in using the PCR technique as a diagnostic test is brilliant, and one I may borrow as I continue my 5+ year effort to help people understand why OCR "tests" for infections with a particular disease were never useful.
It’s odd how measles were kept at bay for years by vaccination, and maybe there is now a slight decline in vaccination rates (most kids are probably vaccinated.)
But all of a sudden, with RFK Jr in power and questioning efficacy and proper testing, they are crying that there is surge of measles. I call BS.
Either they’ve hidden measles cases in the past to protect the pokes, or this “surge” is being faked like Covid. Or perhaps, a combination of the two. It’s really sad that we (STILL) cannot trust the information that is coming to us. We cannot forget the lessons we’ve learned just yet.
Another fact about measles which our medical agencies and the medical industrial complex have now forgotten, is that measles is almost never fatal - except in those individuals who are severely malnourished, or otherwise severely immune compromised.
When measles was the cause of more deaths, many people lived in cities with raw sewage was in the streets, water was often contaminated, children rarely got any sunshine while playing in narrow streets between tall buildings, and malnourishment was common.
Having measles, unlike he vaccines confer life-long immunity, and according to research, also reduce the risk of certain cancers later in life.
Excellent piece of journalism. Kary Mullis always said PCR cannot test for whole viruses, only viral sequences. Forensic labs always dial-up cycle thresholds, which makes the results meaningless.
"PCR is not a diagnostic tool." -Kary Mullis, inventor of and Nobel recipient for the PCR technique.
Lolz
It’s instinctively detecting bullshit …
Which obviously is the backbone of the brilliant pcr scam…
Imagine is Kari Mullis was alive to see how far they managed to scam with his amplification invention
How to fake a pandemic step 1.
PCR detects NO viruses. It shows electrical charges. Again, the lies never end.
And yet another act in the Plandemic by PCR Fraud psyop.
Of course!!! That’s because outwardly diverse life forms share in common significant portions of their genome. For example, Google search key words “earthworm” “human” “genome” gives this:
“While not direct relatives, humans share surprisingly deep genetic roots with worms, particularly with ancient marine acorn worms, with about 70% of human genes tracing back to a common ancestor from over 500 million years ago, revealing shared machinery for development, like gill slits in embryos.”
and this:
“Comparing their genomes to ours shows about 70% of human genes (around 14,000) have counterparts from a common ancestor that lived during the Cambrian explosion.”
….
The PCR test is completely useless because it’s essentially impossible to prove that the genomic sequence that one is amplifying is precisely unique to, say, a corona virus. It’s the “black swan” conundrum of induction. It’s akin to trying to specifically identify an exact song by identifying a short sequence of notes that are contained in the song without knowing if that same sequence of notes is contained in some other song. The media gave some coverage of the so-called “cycle” problem where false positives were obtained because the amplification was so high that it was basically turning background noise into signal. That was all true, but that was actually the lesser of the two problems—the quantitative problem—and it misled people into thinking that if you just kept the cycle count down to a reasonable amount then you’d necessarily have an accurate result. Wrong! The greatest flaw with PCR (as a tool for diagnosing disease) is not quantitative; it’s QUALITATIVE. But the qualitative shortcoming is a little bit more complicated to explain and, frankly, it’s not really something that can be corrected like you could correct the likelihood of a quantitative false positive by simply lowering the cycle threshold. So, since the qualitative flaw is a fatal flaw, it was quietly swept under the rug in the interest of preserving the narrative. Of course, I haven’t even mentioned the fact that even if the target genome was uniquely peculiar to the corona virus and even if the concentration of that virus was accurately determined in either mucus or blood serum, that is far, far removed from any cause and effect relationship that could be made to actual disease or symptoms of disease. To name just one flaw in the logic, genome fragments are just that: fragments. Just because you detect fragments, even if the fragments are unique to a given pathogen, doesn’t mean that the fragments were part of a viable protein and that the protein was in turn part of a viable pathogen that relies on the proper functioning of all the other proteins, etc. that makes a pathogen pathogenic. Incidentally, the antigen tests that largely replaced PCR are similarly flawed, but let’s try and wrap our heads around one psyop at a time.
Excellent points. Among them- excess cycles of amplification increase the chances of a false "positive", but no reduction in cycles fixes the underlying flaw in the use of the PCR technique as a diagnostic test.
Except... the use of Go Ogle*. DuckDuckGo or better yet, get Brave to search the internet.
*The honest way to spell the corporate name.
'Go Ogle Is a Surveillance Organization. Here's How to de-Go Ogle Your Life'
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/google-surveillance-agency-de-google-your-life-cola/
Thanks for the tip and article reference. I actually do use DuckDuckGo but I do have a bad habit of using the word “Google” as a proprietary eponym. It’s a bad habit because it reinforces a false association in the mind of the unsuspecting reader.
Corporations love it when we use their brand names as a general term for a type of product, and train us to do so quite effectively.
Your explanation of the 'fatal flaw' in using the PCR technique as a diagnostic test is brilliant, and one I may borrow as I continue my 5+ year effort to help people understand why OCR "tests" for infections with a particular disease were never useful.
Thank you - and Happy New Year!
Medical Industrial Complex (MIC) gaslighting us again.
This just goes on and on, doesn't it? We've got a "healthcare" industry peopled by psychopaths.
PCR test DONT work.
Its creator has made it abundantly clear!
It’s odd how measles were kept at bay for years by vaccination, and maybe there is now a slight decline in vaccination rates (most kids are probably vaccinated.)
But all of a sudden, with RFK Jr in power and questioning efficacy and proper testing, they are crying that there is surge of measles. I call BS.
Either they’ve hidden measles cases in the past to protect the pokes, or this “surge” is being faked like Covid. Or perhaps, a combination of the two. It’s really sad that we (STILL) cannot trust the information that is coming to us. We cannot forget the lessons we’ve learned just yet.
Another fact about measles which our medical agencies and the medical industrial complex have now forgotten, is that measles is almost never fatal - except in those individuals who are severely malnourished, or otherwise severely immune compromised.
When measles was the cause of more deaths, many people lived in cities with raw sewage was in the streets, water was often contaminated, children rarely got any sunshine while playing in narrow streets between tall buildings, and malnourishment was common.
Having measles, unlike he vaccines confer life-long immunity, and according to research, also reduce the risk of certain cancers later in life.
'..Myths About Measles'
https://rumble.com/v6pwpn8-del-dispels-misinformation-about-measles.html?e9s=src_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_upp_a
Excellent piece of journalism. Kary Mullis always said PCR cannot test for whole viruses, only viral sequences. Forensic labs always dial-up cycle thresholds, which makes the results meaningless.
Maybe Mullis wasn't aware that there are no pathogenic viruses. After all, the censorship has been pretty strenuous. https://archive.org/details/free-articles-from-wissenschafftplus-magazin-feat-stefan-lanka-virology-criticism/2015_Dismantling_The_Virus_Theory_The_measles_virus_as_an_example_Wissenschafftplus_Magazin-wissenschafftplus.de-Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory/