11 Comments
User's avatar
Elliott Middleton's avatar

It was all there, and people like you and Alina Chan and Matt Ridley and Kevin McKernan have helped get it out--but you'll still never find it reported in MSM! WE HAVE A LONG WAY TO GO!

Daniel Meegan's avatar

Global one news 👑

Daniel Meegan's avatar

They also run narrative networks

TnDoc's avatar

Democide plainly and purposely planned for years - with malice aforethought. These same people are still synthesizing new poisons to unleash on Humankind. All of this is both funded (with our own tax dollars) and continued by our own USG in concert with its many psychopathic fellow travelers around the globe. What kind of "scientist" participates in this blatant anti-Humankind activity? The same personality types that populated the ranks of Nazi and Imperial Japanese "scientists". Those murderers never went away, they were just relocated to the US, Israel, the USSR and the PRC at the end of WWII and their work has continued now for nearly a century. There must be accountability for these vast crimes.

PamelaDrew's avatar

What this proves is that petrie dish models exist.. there is no biological p[lausibility but the best debunking of DEFUSE evidence is from former DRASTIC member Dr. Jay Couey. Conflating white papers & proposals to possibility of invisible enemy.. priceless!!

https://gigaohmbiological.substack.com/p/usrtk-scooby-doo-mystery-is-solved

Leslie H MSc's avatar

As a self-described muckraker, how do you know the scope of plausibility? What evidence suggests no biological plausibility in this case? And no, we don’t need to accept categorical errors by assuming white papers are the same as reality. But are you dismissing the article or discussion of proposals that were made involving factors that appeared in reality after a presumably typical R&D process? Why not highlight how early Principles worthy of a government application for funding, translated into tech that justified American patents?

Andrew Hewett's avatar

You are on the right track, the only issue is - they've never "isolated" a "virus," i.e. control studies have debunked the "isolation" process. So, what I would say is - don't trust everything they claim is true. The alleged coronavirus genome is a computer construct i.e. SARS-CoV-2 is a synthetic, modified amino-acid genome computer construct. They modified a part of this construct, which was perfect for their mRNA platform i.e. the gain-of-function "spike protein (as you laid out), BUT the body does not operate as they BELIEVE i.e. the "virus model."

Any BELIEF that the jabs are self-spreading/shedding is based on a few issues. One is the BELIEF in "viruses" and that our bodies are now manufacturing "spike protein." "Spike" being identified all over the body is qualified by non-specific antibody testing i.e. it's assumed the cells are manufacturing this g-o-f spike, when the tests could be positive for numerous reasons. The other issue is that genome sequencing is assumed as accurate, when in fact the "Virus Deniers" control studies used NO "virus-laden" MUCOSAL sample and still had their isolates "qualified" (against) numerous alleged "viruses," (computer sequences) i.e. the computer constructs the sequence against another sequence (it creates the match).

"Data" is being created that's believed to be true (similar to the PCR tests). Whereas those antibody tests could be a signal that LNP hydrogel is all over the body or general vial content i.e. it does not indicate/qualify that our cells are manufacturing their synthetic spike poison. The concept of "shedding" could also be an Electromagnetic frequency issue i.e. the graphene-oriented LNP hydrogel is amplifying EMFs, OR enzymes that synchronise the menstrual cycle (detoxing) between women are being disrupted. Yes! I'm laying down the view that people, depending on their body's need, synchronise detoxing - this is NOT the same as contagion, which has never been proven.

What you are laying out is the proof of intent to do harm i.e. a deliberate creation of a toxin that would be ideal to be married to an mRNA bioweapon, regardless of whether the set bioweapon could actually achieve what they intellectually laid out.

Sadly, issues with antibody testing and genome sequencing, which then create/generate "data" that the Health Freedom Movement analyzes, are likely not going to be discussed; i.e., interpretations will continue to be supportive of the "virus" model of disease.

The Jab Killers would prefer fighting “who” created the gain-of-function “virus” vs. Virology being accepted as being totally debunked.

CharlieSeattle's avatar

11 months in! When will these greedy genocidal criminals be arrested?

World law enforcement agencies must arrest Bill Gates, Walensky, Birx, Baric, Fauci, Dr. Peter Marks, Collins, Daszak and all former and present DOD, DARPA, CIA, CDC, NIH, WHO, FDA, HHS and big pharma and big tech. executives involved for crimes against humanity!

Fraud and Genocide are ...not included... in the total immunity from legal liability agreement under the PREP Act for the big Pharma criminals! I know, I've read it!

Nuremberg Code and RICO laws apply now! The Trump DOJ better wake the Fk Up and get busy!

Federal Crimes, Insurrection and conspiracy are what RICO laws are for!

Trial at 2 PM, Executions at 2:27 PM. Rope is reusable!

Leslie H MSc's avatar

ohhh dear, 🙏🏻 such FOIAs:

Is this news to celebrate of 🇺🇸-made plans to drop GOF gifts from the US-controlled airspace? Is this just the next trap for conspiracy theorists who might claim Santa is real based on this, or claim the flying sled and reindeers are commercial distraction. I don’t know, yet feel it can literally be sickening what gifts are bought with tax money and delivered to us and all animals outdoors regardless of our wishlists.

Is this like a nine-11 program extending everywhere to potentially anyone not in the know, and ready-to-go, but without the military-controlled demolition experts restricting the scope and timing of the civilian Friendlies’ kill zone?

Seasons greetings? Stay indoors with a gas mask if it looks like snow? Also, avoid holidays boating with a picnic basket onboard in the Caribbean or Sea of America or whatever our dear POTUS calls it.

Peace, love and good health to you and family. 💝

User's avatar
Comment removed
Dec 6, 2025
Comment removed
Andrew Hewett's avatar

Based on what you're putting down -

The "proof" of the "circulating virus" is in the computer "sequencing" process/construction; this process has been debunked by the "Virus Deniers."

Dr Li-Meng Yan claimed that the first mucosal sample SEQUENCING was "matched" to SARS, but I believe she was deceived. They could have done this, but in order for the "Spike protein" sequence to be as Jon has laid out (incl. Moderna's furin cleavage sequence, etc.), I suspect Illumina did a Bait & Switch for the pre-designed SARS-CoV-2 sequence. Dr Quay looked at the sequences derived from that first mucosal sample and, in his mind, thought that it had to have been contaminated in the lab. I don't think this is what happened. I believe they threw in a lot of other "virus" genome sequences among their constructed "SARS-CoV-2" sequence to obscure focus on their bait&switch construct they wanted to be "found"/"discovered" i.e. their modified SARS-CoV-2 computer sequence that included the toxin they wanted for their jabs.

It sounds like what you are saying is that the Jab Manufacturers added the 2P modification to the "Spike Protein" after they were emailed the "SARS-CoV-2" genome sequence as a "stabilising strategy," BUT when people were tested (BS) for the alleged "virus" the sequencing process used matched samples to the non-inclusive 2P sequence modification? This would be logical. Qualifying the existence of spike is tested against a non-specific antibody, so there's no identification of the 2P modification in the jabbed based on that test. Your claim that the 2P did not end up in the "circulating virus" is based on the tests you believe qualify there was a "circulating virus" to begin with.

The 2P modification would have been left out of the sequence template being used to MATCH the public's mucosal samples against. This trick of "qualifying" a computer sequence to a believed-in "virus" (allegedly "isolated" or not) has been exposed by the "Virus Deniers'" control studies.

John's avatar

Explanation here...

https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/reverse-engineering-source-code-of-the-biontech-pfizer-vaccine/

"The spikes are mounted on the

virus body (’the nucleocapsid protein’). But the thing is, our vaccine is only generating the spikes itself, and we’re not mounting them on any kind of virus body.

It turns out that, unmodified, freestanding Spike proteins collapse into a different structure. If injected as a vaccine, this would indeed cause our bodies to develop immunity.. but only against the collapsed spike protein."

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prca.202300048

Detection of recombinant Spike protein in the blood of individuals vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2: Possible molecular mechanisms

"Experimental design

Mass spectrometry examination of biological samples was used to detect the presence of specific fragments of recombinant Spike protein in subjects who received mRNA-based vaccines.

Results

The specific PP-Spike fragment was found in 50% of the biological samples analyzed, and its presence was independent of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titer. The minimum and maximum time at which PP-Spike was detected after vaccination was 69 and 187 days, respectively.

Conclusions and clinical relevance

The presented method allows to evaluate the half-life of the Spike protein molecule “PP” and to consider the risks or benefits in continuing to administer additional booster doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. This approach is of valuable support to complement antibody level monitoring and represents the first proteomic detection of recombinant Spike in vaccinated subjects."

It would also be a good method to detect spread in the unvaccinated.